I enjoyed the first one because hey it was unique and different. The guy that played the villain in it was awesome and the best thing about the whole film. Thing is the 1st film isn't really graphic it's just nasty. There is hardly even any blood it's just the set up and you know what's happening. Pretty much nothing phases me though so I'll admit I laughed at it a bit as well. The 2nd was just silly and its only goal was to be one of the sickest movies ever. I can't see this creepy fat guy pulling off this procedure and Dr. Lieter from the first film is what made the 1st film for me. It's worth at least one watch if you can stomach it because it's not like anything else out there. It's original regardless. I've seen more graphic horror like Grotesque and 100 Days Of Sodom so this was nothing to me.
What do you think of "the human centipede"?
← View full post
I enjoyed the first one because hey it was unique and different. The guy that played the villain in it was awesome and the best thing about the whole film. Thing is the 1st film isn't really graphic it's just nasty. There is hardly even any blood it's just the set up and you know what's happening. Pretty much nothing phases me though so I'll admit I laughed at it a bit as well. The 2nd was just silly and its only goal was to be one of the sickest movies ever. I can't see this creepy fat guy pulling off this procedure and Dr. Lieter from the first film is what made the 1st film for me. It's worth at least one watch if you can stomach it because it's not like anything else out there. It's original regardless. I've seen more graphic horror like Grotesque and 100 Days Of Sodom so this was nothing to me.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
100 Days Of Sodom, oh how I would love to have met the Marquis de Sade.