I think the game sucks too. True, it's for people who don't want to buy a better game. There are a few games out there that are free and are still better than Combat Arms. Honestly, if you're playing Combat Arms right now then stop. Play Counterstrike: Source, Team Fortress 2, Modern Warfare 2, or Battlefield: Bad Company 2. If you still want to play Free-to-play games then play Crossfire, Operation 7, or Alliance of Valiant Arms. If you're lucky and know a lot about proxies then try Blackshot. Don't play Combat Arms. The players who spend money buying NX items and NX weapons in the game have a major advantage over the players who only buy GP weapons and GP items. The game is unbalanced and has a big hacker problem. Even the high ranked players are big closet hackers.
You know what?... Screw that. Just play console shooters because they barely harbor any hackers in their games..... the only PC shooters that has less hackers are the ones you have to actually pay for. Which brings me back to free-to-play vs buy-to-play. If you play FTP games then you won't get the most out of them as you would with the game that you have to buy in order to play. You get more support from those type of games.
In the battle between FTP vs. buy-to-play. Buy to play games win.
Combat Arms sucks so move on to a better game. If you're pro in Combat Arms then guess what?... NOBODY CARES!!! Gamers who play other games won't care how good you are in a lame Free-to-play game that is soooo easy yet unbalanced.
I will say this.... Other than the gameplay of Combat Arms being too fast and the unbalance of the game being so annoying, it's still one of the best that I played. Counter-Strike:Source and Modern Warfare 2 does beat Combat Arms but out of all the Free-to-play FPS military-based shooters out there, this is the second or third best i've played. Alliance of Valiant Arms beats it by a lot.
What do you think of the game, Combat Arms?
← View full post
I think the game sucks too. True, it's for people who don't want to buy a better game. There are a few games out there that are free and are still better than Combat Arms. Honestly, if you're playing Combat Arms right now then stop. Play Counterstrike: Source, Team Fortress 2, Modern Warfare 2, or Battlefield: Bad Company 2. If you still want to play Free-to-play games then play Crossfire, Operation 7, or Alliance of Valiant Arms. If you're lucky and know a lot about proxies then try Blackshot. Don't play Combat Arms. The players who spend money buying NX items and NX weapons in the game have a major advantage over the players who only buy GP weapons and GP items. The game is unbalanced and has a big hacker problem. Even the high ranked players are big closet hackers.
You know what?... Screw that. Just play console shooters because they barely harbor any hackers in their games..... the only PC shooters that has less hackers are the ones you have to actually pay for. Which brings me back to free-to-play vs buy-to-play. If you play FTP games then you won't get the most out of them as you would with the game that you have to buy in order to play. You get more support from those type of games.
In the battle between FTP vs. buy-to-play. Buy to play games win.
Combat Arms sucks so move on to a better game. If you're pro in Combat Arms then guess what?... NOBODY CARES!!! Gamers who play other games won't care how good you are in a lame Free-to-play game that is soooo easy yet unbalanced.
--
ketamine
13 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I will say this.... Other than the gameplay of Combat Arms being too fast and the unbalance of the game being so annoying, it's still one of the best that I played. Counter-Strike:Source and Modern Warfare 2 does beat Combat Arms but out of all the Free-to-play FPS military-based shooters out there, this is the second or third best i've played. Alliance of Valiant Arms beats it by a lot.