After I typed my reply, I considered editing it and adding something that looked incredibly similar to your last sentence, but instead I moved on to the next story. I held back because I remembered that some people are litigious and it's quite normal to want to be compensated for bad things that happen to you (and your children). And I couldn't really argue the point because, in some way, I understand it. It seems wrong to me that nobody questioned the ethics of the parents, but maybe people thought they'd been through enough. I don't know. It's an emotive issue. Which perhaps is even more reason for the impartial hand of the legal system.
What do you think of Michael Jackson?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
After I typed my reply, I considered editing it and adding something that looked incredibly similar to your last sentence, but instead I moved on to the next story. I held back because I remembered that some people are litigious and it's quite normal to want to be compensated for bad things that happen to you (and your children). And I couldn't really argue the point because, in some way, I understand it. It seems wrong to me that nobody questioned the ethics of the parents, but maybe people thought they'd been through enough. I don't know. It's an emotive issue. Which perhaps is even more reason for the impartial hand of the legal system.