What do you think about girls with stretched ears?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

↑ View this comment's parent

← View full post
Comments ( 3 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • Actually they have every right.

    1) It's not a protected class as I stated above

    2) Many of those neck/skull/hand tats are actually recycled gang symbols so technically they could be exercising a "no hate" policy.

    Yeah really. I knew a guy who had an interesting spiderweb tat on his elbow. He probably thought it was just a cool image. When in fact it stemmed from prison culture where the tat represented your "mark" for killing a minority. And that each web ring represented how many you killed.

    So any business can request that tats are covered up. Besides, as the skull-face kid has already proven, you CAN cover up extensive tats with makeup.

    <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtUUOxskTA0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtUUOxskTA0</a>

    So there's no reason why it can't be covered for work if the tat is considered to be unprofessional. Even if it's on your face.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • 1.it's a personal point of view, I'm not saying that I'll take the employer to court for that, since it's not a protected class, you're right. yet, in my opinion it shouldn't happen at all.

      2.Yes, the symbolism used to be represent a criminal hierarchy and give a full report of your "achievements". This created this nagative opinion about bodyart. it is not so nowdays, yes, some kids still get tats in prisons, but it's a dying breed. Most of the "old school" tattooing is just art, nothing else. "No hate" applies ONLY when you have symbols on you that represent/used to represent hate crimes or racist/nationalist gangs.
      Biker gang tattooes, for example are absolutely legal.
      By the way, spiderwebs on elbows mean something else in every country i've been to. So I wouldn't really draw my conclusions on one place.. kinda close minded.

      zombie boy make up was awesome, I know this video (appreciate the links, but i know what you're talking about, lol), however it was a very expensive photoshoot. Why should I spend my time on that to confirm to some obsolete and outdated social norm. it's 21st cetury, about time to review our policies on this issue as well.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • thing is... it's not always easy to tell which were inked for hate and which were just because someone thought a gang violence tat was "cool".

        we had a training presentation to watch at work and i was a bit shocked cos... i recognized a lot of tats.

        Comment Hidden ( show )