Why the photographers, if you don't mind me asking? No offence, it just seems like such a strange thing to think, in my opinion. I mean, the photographer is just a part of showing people the reality of the situation (again, just my opinion). If people only got to see the pictures of animals *after* having been to the vets, etc., then it doesn't really demonstrate just how bad the situation is. I do see where you're coming from, it's just their job, I guess. I don't know, I just think that if anyone needs a kicking it's the people who abuse animals in the first place.
Yep, it's a strange thing, but i take it as a prerequisite that i want to hurt the people who did it. people who take photos instead of helping the animals are just second, i.e first after the offenders, on my kick list.
What do you feel about the animal cruelty commercials?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Why the photographers, if you don't mind me asking? No offence, it just seems like such a strange thing to think, in my opinion. I mean, the photographer is just a part of showing people the reality of the situation (again, just my opinion). If people only got to see the pictures of animals *after* having been to the vets, etc., then it doesn't really demonstrate just how bad the situation is. I do see where you're coming from, it's just their job, I guess. I don't know, I just think that if anyone needs a kicking it's the people who abuse animals in the first place.
--
Queen^of^Spades
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yep, it's a strange thing, but i take it as a prerequisite that i want to hurt the people who did it. people who take photos instead of helping the animals are just second, i.e first after the offenders, on my kick list.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Ihadtomakeyetanotheraccountffs
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You're an idiot.
You think they don't get them help after? The photos are there to document evidence of the animal abuse.