Probably not. The ideal mate for me would be the one who matched my three 'needs' and then who was best for me in any other category that isn't a need. But I don't need ideal. I just need... well, my needs. All else is negotiable.
To give a different example, humans need food that has calorific value. That doesn't mean the ideal food for humans is raw sugar or lard even though it fulfills the limited criteria of 'need'.
I guess someone who was quite extreme in one attribute but lacking in most others. She could be someone who was hyper-intelligent but detested affection, wasn't sociable, uncaring, didn't engage me, didn't challenge me. Someone missing the vitamins and minerals that a balanced meals gives you, and lard doesn't.
They both have the calories I need, but one is better for me than the other.
What do you consider in a girl? (boys)
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Probably not. The ideal mate for me would be the one who matched my three 'needs' and then who was best for me in any other category that isn't a need. But I don't need ideal. I just need... well, my needs. All else is negotiable.
To give a different example, humans need food that has calorific value. That doesn't mean the ideal food for humans is raw sugar or lard even though it fulfills the limited criteria of 'need'.
--
phillustine
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
So what kind of woman would be lard? (no sarcasm intended)
--
dappled
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I guess someone who was quite extreme in one attribute but lacking in most others. She could be someone who was hyper-intelligent but detested affection, wasn't sociable, uncaring, didn't engage me, didn't challenge me. Someone missing the vitamins and minerals that a balanced meals gives you, and lard doesn't.
They both have the calories I need, but one is better for me than the other.
--
phillustine
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I think you would still eat the lard. This is nature of vice, no?