I understand there's no observable example of a rocket landing on a boat I can go and see.
Watching and understanding is different from watching and being shown proof. It's not that I don't understand it. I understand what they say just fine, I just don't believe it's real. You can understand how phasers on star trek work if you read into it, it doesn't mean they actually exist.
I haven't been shown scientific proof of the things NASA claims to do. They could take that grasshopper 750m test vehicle out on a boat off the shore and launch and land it again, that would count as proof. But the rocket isn't real, because the flame leaves a shadow in the 750m test video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZDkItO-0a4&t=23s
I understand flames don't leave shadows. Clearly that's too complex for you to understand. I understand green screens and harnesses exist. I understand that filtering apps exist that can superimpose fake floating objects in front of you. I understand that astronauts train underwater and not in a vacuum. The only actual on-earth test of a space suit in a vacuum almost killed the guy they tried it on. See, I understand your blood will boil in a vacuum because it's been experimentally proven. "These rocks are moon rocks" isn't proof of anything. It's not even real evidence.
But since this isnt really the topic here do you also believe that regular people took over a federal building in washington and occupied it illegally for hours with absolutely no military action taken to stop them or even stop them from going home, and now they're looking for them because they brought professional photographers with them to take professional posed and framed photos which they then posted online? And none of this was an inside job?
What did Trump say to incite his supporters to storm Capitol?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Right. Watching and believing isn't; watching and understanding is. Unfortunately it's clearly too complex for you to understand.
--
SmokeEverything
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
I understand there's no observable example of a rocket landing on a boat I can go and see.
Watching and understanding is different from watching and being shown proof. It's not that I don't understand it. I understand what they say just fine, I just don't believe it's real. You can understand how phasers on star trek work if you read into it, it doesn't mean they actually exist.
I haven't been shown scientific proof of the things NASA claims to do. They could take that grasshopper 750m test vehicle out on a boat off the shore and launch and land it again, that would count as proof. But the rocket isn't real, because the flame leaves a shadow in the 750m test video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZDkItO-0a4&t=23s
I understand flames don't leave shadows. Clearly that's too complex for you to understand. I understand green screens and harnesses exist. I understand that filtering apps exist that can superimpose fake floating objects in front of you. I understand that astronauts train underwater and not in a vacuum. The only actual on-earth test of a space suit in a vacuum almost killed the guy they tried it on. See, I understand your blood will boil in a vacuum because it's been experimentally proven. "These rocks are moon rocks" isn't proof of anything. It's not even real evidence.
But since this isnt really the topic here do you also believe that regular people took over a federal building in washington and occupied it illegally for hours with absolutely no military action taken to stop them or even stop them from going home, and now they're looking for them because they brought professional photographers with them to take professional posed and framed photos which they then posted online? And none of this was an inside job?