Probably said "action" to the actors before the cameras clicked on for that completely obviously staged event. A 5 year old can tell it was a staged event. People need to stop watching the news.
I don't watch the news, because I don't have time to waste getting riled up about one thing, or another just so I can get stressed out, and have a flare up of my myofascial pain, and IBS.
Watching and believing a video isn't scientific proof. That's basically the same thing as telling somebody who says giant talking anthromorphic birds don't exist to "Just watch Sesame Street, bro." I can break down exactly how they could fake the space station videos with openly existing technology. It's all fakeable, so there's no reason to believe it's real.
Demonstrating a rocket landing on a boat with a model would be science. But they can't do that. As shown by the fact that nobody has been able to do it.
I understand there's no observable example of a rocket landing on a boat I can go and see.
Watching and understanding is different from watching and being shown proof. It's not that I don't understand it. I understand what they say just fine, I just don't believe it's real. You can understand how phasers on star trek work if you read into it, it doesn't mean they actually exist.
I haven't been shown scientific proof of the things NASA claims to do. They could take that grasshopper 750m test vehicle out on a boat off the shore and launch and land it again, that would count as proof. But the rocket isn't real, because the flame leaves a shadow in the 750m test video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZDkItO-0a4&t=23s
I understand flames don't leave shadows. Clearly that's too complex for you to understand. I understand green screens and harnesses exist. I understand that filtering apps exist that can superimpose fake floating objects in front of you. I understand that astronauts train underwater and not in a vacuum. The only actual on-earth test of a space suit in a vacuum almost killed the guy they tried it on. See, I understand your blood will boil in a vacuum because it's been experimentally proven. "These rocks are moon rocks" isn't proof of anything. It's not even real evidence.
But since this isnt really the topic here do you also believe that regular people took over a federal building in washington and occupied it illegally for hours with absolutely no military action taken to stop them or even stop them from going home, and now they're looking for them because they brought professional photographers with them to take professional posed and framed photos which they then posted online? And none of this was an inside job?
I dont support any government. Im not a trump base person. You're telling me people stormed a federal building and weren't shot? Damn, tell me they went to the moon next.
I dont really care if you slag me on here but I'm not a they/them, Im one single male person.
As for the current topic I didn't mention any hard drugs, and I've never represented myself as anything other than an alcoholic handyman on here, Im as "enlightened" as anyone who can drink a few beers and go change a wall outlet.
The US defense budget can't defend police stations from "rioters" and cant even defend the capitol building from random hillbillies. You're going to take the debate point that all these things aren't being allowed to happen? They really couldn't have just shot the hell out of all these guys storming congress? Everyone's so dumb theyre arguing over the moraity of these psyops.
Real groups of people would've been ventillated trying to storm US federal buildings. But ok, A kid can get enough guns and ammo to shoot up a school but the US government can't defend their own buildings, riiiight.
Its amazing to watch people who still participate in society justifying how any of this makes sense. Imagine storming your local courthouse with 30 of your friends (DONT. I AM NOD ADVOCATING DOING THIS TO ANY FBI WATCHING) but imagine how that would go. Now apply it to a fucking DC federal building. Jesus mary satan fucking crist bro.
The pronoun "they" isn't just used to refer to a group of people. It's also used for when you don't know the sex of the person you're referring to. How the crap am I supposed to know if you're male or female if I've never seen you say anything that gives an indication one way or the other? Stop getting bent out of shape.
"I've never represented myself as anything other than an alcoholic handyman on here, Im as "enlightened" as anyone who can drink a few beers and go change a wall outlet." Dude, on a different post, you literally said to me, and I quote, "Ive spent my whole life doing hard drugs and I can see whats going on in the world right now better than most people."
What you're implying here is that if there had been mass casualties strewn around the Capitol, you would accept that the event that happened did actually occur.
But the thing is, even when there _are_ mass casualties, people of your mindset _still_ insist it's all fake. The Sandy Hook Elementary School slaughter of children is a prime example. For years, Alex Jones and wingnut asshats of his ilk denied that any children had died there, and claimed it was all an enormous conspiracy designed to justify taking their precious guns away from them.
I do agree that what happened last Wednesday was very strange. If you look at all the forces of so-called law and order which were deployed in DC during the BLM protests last summer, all the body armor and hardware displayed in an effort to intimidate and the heavy-handed way those forces sometimes dealt with the protestors, and compare all that to the pathetic display around the Capitol, the contrast is glaring.
What's also glaringly obvious is the difference between the two different groups of people the cops were facing. Last summer, it was black people and their allies of other skin-tones, and a pretty good mix of ages and genders; last Wednesday, the crowd was almost all white and predominantly male. In other words, the mob looked an awful lot like most of the people in charge of trying to maintain order. And, since cops tend to have an authoritarian mindset, you can be sure that a lot of the boys in blue sympathised with the Trumpist mob.
Oh, and BTW, the bloated US defence budget doesn't have anything to do with the resources and manpower available to police forces. Not directly, anyway. Over the last 30 years, cops all over the USA have been able to tool themselves up with more than $7 billion worth of surplus military hardware at very low cost. But whether it's right or justified for American cops to be equipped like an occupying army is another issue.
You know people 2 hours away who were in this severely suspect thing? Do you have any independent video they provided? Im not doubting your completely anecdotal 14 word story, I just want to know if you being involved closely with this has provided any actual evidence of the goings on over there.
Have no reason to doubt you, but no reason to trust you either. Somebody on here a month or so ago told me they knew people in antarctic reaserch lab. I dont automatically trust strangers, but if you have a personal relation to this stuff Im more than willing to go over your evidence. Im a truth seeker, Im not trying to advance any political theory.
What did Trump say to incite his supporters to storm Capitol?
← View full post
Probably said "action" to the actors before the cameras clicked on for that completely obviously staged event. A 5 year old can tell it was a staged event. People need to stop watching the news.
--
RoseIsabella
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
DoctorD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I don't watch the news, because I don't have time to waste getting riled up about one thing, or another just so I can get stressed out, and have a flare up of my myofascial pain, and IBS.
--
SmokeEverything
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
Dont watch news. It stresses you cause its supposed to.
A five-year-old can also tell we've been to the moon.
--
SmokeEverything
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Please explain what scientific process a five year old would use to verify claims of space travel. What a dumb comment dude, you gotta try harder.
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The same ones used in the multitude of videos that have been made to help break it down for people like you.
--
SmokeEverything
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Watching and believing a video isn't scientific proof. That's basically the same thing as telling somebody who says giant talking anthromorphic birds don't exist to "Just watch Sesame Street, bro." I can break down exactly how they could fake the space station videos with openly existing technology. It's all fakeable, so there's no reason to believe it's real.
Demonstrating a rocket landing on a boat with a model would be science. But they can't do that. As shown by the fact that nobody has been able to do it.
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Right. Watching and believing isn't; watching and understanding is. Unfortunately it's clearly too complex for you to understand.
--
SmokeEverything
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
I understand there's no observable example of a rocket landing on a boat I can go and see.
Watching and understanding is different from watching and being shown proof. It's not that I don't understand it. I understand what they say just fine, I just don't believe it's real. You can understand how phasers on star trek work if you read into it, it doesn't mean they actually exist.
I haven't been shown scientific proof of the things NASA claims to do. They could take that grasshopper 750m test vehicle out on a boat off the shore and launch and land it again, that would count as proof. But the rocket isn't real, because the flame leaves a shadow in the 750m test video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZDkItO-0a4&t=23s
I understand flames don't leave shadows. Clearly that's too complex for you to understand. I understand green screens and harnesses exist. I understand that filtering apps exist that can superimpose fake floating objects in front of you. I understand that astronauts train underwater and not in a vacuum. The only actual on-earth test of a space suit in a vacuum almost killed the guy they tried it on. See, I understand your blood will boil in a vacuum because it's been experimentally proven. "These rocks are moon rocks" isn't proof of anything. It's not even real evidence.
But since this isnt really the topic here do you also believe that regular people took over a federal building in washington and occupied it illegally for hours with absolutely no military action taken to stop them or even stop them from going home, and now they're looking for them because they brought professional photographers with them to take professional posed and framed photos which they then posted online? And none of this was an inside job?
So you have a source for your claims? I dont trust the media but Trump and his base have lied so many times that I domt trust them either.
--
SmokeEverything
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Look at the source material.
I dont support any government. Im not a trump base person. You're telling me people stormed a federal building and weren't shot? Damn, tell me they went to the moon next.
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You realize five of them were killed, one a woman shot directly through the neck, right?
--
Inkmaster
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
4
4
-
SmokeEverything
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Ignore them. They do/did hard drugs and thinks that makes them more enlightened.
--
SmokeEverything
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
I dont really care if you slag me on here but I'm not a they/them, Im one single male person.
As for the current topic I didn't mention any hard drugs, and I've never represented myself as anything other than an alcoholic handyman on here, Im as "enlightened" as anyone who can drink a few beers and go change a wall outlet.
The US defense budget can't defend police stations from "rioters" and cant even defend the capitol building from random hillbillies. You're going to take the debate point that all these things aren't being allowed to happen? They really couldn't have just shot the hell out of all these guys storming congress? Everyone's so dumb theyre arguing over the moraity of these psyops.
Real groups of people would've been ventillated trying to storm US federal buildings. But ok, A kid can get enough guns and ammo to shoot up a school but the US government can't defend their own buildings, riiiight.
Its amazing to watch people who still participate in society justifying how any of this makes sense. Imagine storming your local courthouse with 30 of your friends (DONT. I AM NOD ADVOCATING DOING THIS TO ANY FBI WATCHING) but imagine how that would go. Now apply it to a fucking DC federal building. Jesus mary satan fucking crist bro.
--
Inkmaster
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
See More Comments =>
-
Boojum
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
See More Comments =>
The pronoun "they" isn't just used to refer to a group of people. It's also used for when you don't know the sex of the person you're referring to. How the crap am I supposed to know if you're male or female if I've never seen you say anything that gives an indication one way or the other? Stop getting bent out of shape.
"I've never represented myself as anything other than an alcoholic handyman on here, Im as "enlightened" as anyone who can drink a few beers and go change a wall outlet." Dude, on a different post, you literally said to me, and I quote, "Ive spent my whole life doing hard drugs and I can see whats going on in the world right now better than most people."
What you're implying here is that if there had been mass casualties strewn around the Capitol, you would accept that the event that happened did actually occur.
But the thing is, even when there _are_ mass casualties, people of your mindset _still_ insist it's all fake. The Sandy Hook Elementary School slaughter of children is a prime example. For years, Alex Jones and wingnut asshats of his ilk denied that any children had died there, and claimed it was all an enormous conspiracy designed to justify taking their precious guns away from them.
I do agree that what happened last Wednesday was very strange. If you look at all the forces of so-called law and order which were deployed in DC during the BLM protests last summer, all the body armor and hardware displayed in an effort to intimidate and the heavy-handed way those forces sometimes dealt with the protestors, and compare all that to the pathetic display around the Capitol, the contrast is glaring.
What's also glaringly obvious is the difference between the two different groups of people the cops were facing. Last summer, it was black people and their allies of other skin-tones, and a pretty good mix of ages and genders; last Wednesday, the crowd was almost all white and predominantly male. In other words, the mob looked an awful lot like most of the people in charge of trying to maintain order. And, since cops tend to have an authoritarian mindset, you can be sure that a lot of the boys in blue sympathised with the Trumpist mob.
Oh, and BTW, the bloated US defence budget doesn't have anything to do with the resources and manpower available to police forces. Not directly, anyway. Over the last 30 years, cops all over the USA have been able to tool themselves up with more than $7 billion worth of surplus military hardware at very low cost. But whether it's right or justified for American cops to be equipped like an occupying army is another issue.
You realize crisis actors exist, right?
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I literally live about 2 hours away and know three of the dumb fucks who participated.
--
SmokeEverything
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Im interested.
You know people 2 hours away who were in this severely suspect thing? Do you have any independent video they provided? Im not doubting your completely anecdotal 14 word story, I just want to know if you being involved closely with this has provided any actual evidence of the goings on over there.
Have no reason to doubt you, but no reason to trust you either. Somebody on here a month or so ago told me they knew people in antarctic reaserch lab. I dont automatically trust strangers, but if you have a personal relation to this stuff Im more than willing to go over your evidence. Im a truth seeker, Im not trying to advance any political theory.