If you believe in evolution, you could simply say that animals that laid eggs evolved that ability before chickens, so eggs.
However, that's really unsatisfying, so why don't we say it has to be a chicken egg.
Once again, going off of evolution, we assume that the first modern chicken must have hatched from an egg from that of a very slightly less modern chicken. If our definition is that it must be the egg of the chicken we know and love, then the chicken is first, because the first egg that produced the chicken was not a chicken egg, so therefore it must have produced the first egg itself. So, the chicken
Let's try that again with creationism.
Pretty much all creationism beginnings of animals that I know of state that they were all created at once, suggesting that they were already in their animal forms, not unborn or in eggs. So, the chicken.
Therefore, we conclude that most all beliefs point to the chicken being first. :)
Agree, but your first line is confusing.
Since evolution is the truth I'll say I 'believe' it, so obviously I'm in that category.
But I say the chicken was first, since the 'less modern chicken' (or more appropriately, NOT a chicken at all, but some strange bird thingy, laid its egg. If you were there (even as a scientist) you'd say, hey that DODO chicken looking thing, just laid its DODO egg, NOT a chicken egg!
The chicken then hatches out, and you would say, I call this strange new breed, a chicken. Which was born from that DODO prehistoric egg :D
What came first, the chicken or the egg?
← View full post
Here we go:
If you believe in evolution, you could simply say that animals that laid eggs evolved that ability before chickens, so eggs.
However, that's really unsatisfying, so why don't we say it has to be a chicken egg.
Once again, going off of evolution, we assume that the first modern chicken must have hatched from an egg from that of a very slightly less modern chicken. If our definition is that it must be the egg of the chicken we know and love, then the chicken is first, because the first egg that produced the chicken was not a chicken egg, so therefore it must have produced the first egg itself. So, the chicken
Let's try that again with creationism.
Pretty much all creationism beginnings of animals that I know of state that they were all created at once, suggesting that they were already in their animal forms, not unborn or in eggs. So, the chicken.
Therefore, we conclude that most all beliefs point to the chicken being first. :)
--
Dad
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Agree, but your first line is confusing.
Since evolution is the truth I'll say I 'believe' it, so obviously I'm in that category.
But I say the chicken was first, since the 'less modern chicken' (or more appropriately, NOT a chicken at all, but some strange bird thingy, laid its egg. If you were there (even as a scientist) you'd say, hey that DODO chicken looking thing, just laid its DODO egg, NOT a chicken egg!
The chicken then hatches out, and you would say, I call this strange new breed, a chicken. Which was born from that DODO prehistoric egg :D
--
Hoppy2142
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You dont see evidence of design, he has you in his grip right now away from the truth
--
Dad
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No, I don't see ANY evidence of design in anything at all.
I only see the natural evolution of all life and the universe.
I mean what the hell are you looking at? :D