Ask Your Question today
What do you think about Q? Prophecy, utter delusion, or something else? Please comment.
| Q is 100% legit and the storm is coming | 2 | |
| Q is sincere but human and miscalculated a few things | 1 | |
| Q was legitimate but going public led to being stopped | 0 | |
| Q knew a thing or two but was largely delusional | 4 | |
| Q was probably a 12-year-old troll and the people who bought it were insanely ignorant | 10 |
Where does alex Jones end up on that list. He hates Q as it's just a scapegoat for hating conspiracy theorists.
To quote the great Alex Jones, "I'm kinda retarded."
Have you seen the video of him refuting Q (because he's angry they're threatening his monopoly on crazy)? He breaks the fourth wall and bursts out laughing so hard amid having been trying to look angry and screaming because he knows it sounds like he's insulting a mirror. He's so funny when he breaks character.
He's not actually stupid enough to believe any of the stuff he goes on about, and even might be somewhat on the brighter side. For example he tried to stop the Capitol riots. When no one would even stop scuffling about or be quiet long enough to listen, he started chanting, "USA! USA! USA!"
They instantly heard him out. He knows how to play those people like a fiddle. He's a professional troll, maybe the best in the world. He even admitted it's all an act in court.
Q was retarded. I think some of the stuff he said he might have meant, but still.
So lets really answer the question.
1st followup- Question: Which Q.
Q from Star Trek?
Q from the original James Bond movies?
Q from the last several James Bond movies?
Q is a very distinct person in each case.
Q is also the very first letter of a lot of names that begin with the letter q; however, the question was about "Q" and not about a longer word.
I liked the original James Bond Movies Q the best, The Star Trek Q is an interesting person...; and I've not a lot of interest in the more recent Q of the more recent James Bond Movies.
I meant Q as in QAnon as in someone who anonymously posted on the internet claiming to be a government insider and eventually gained a cult following. They brainwashed, manipulated, and radicalized a lot of Trump supporters by basically acting almost like a Biblical phophet speaking of the end times.
They bear a great deal of the responsibility for the attack on the Capitol.
Doesnt Epstein kind of prove those things right? We know multiple world leaders were engaged in ped0philia. The whole pizzagate shit was about Epstein and everyonr said it was crazy and that Epstein just got caught up with an underage hooker 20 years ago and wasnt trafficking kids. Turns out they were wrong about atleast that.
Epstein had been doing that forever. It was known years before his demise.
No, Epstein does not add any legitimacy to Qanon. Those people think it's some kind of sign if someone has a damn stain on their shirt.
No it wasnt known forever that Epstein was doing it. I can show you a few segments from mainstream media claiming Epstein trafficking was a conspiracy theory. It was only accepted once he was arrested. As I said before that it was claimed that he paid an underage hooker for sex in the early 2000s and that he is not trafficking.
I specifically remember reading in detail about what was allegedly going on by one of the underage girls he had hired, years ago.
A woman working for him would offer underage girls some money to give a rich dude (epstein) massages at his residence in Florida. Which was just a ploy to get them there. Ultimately it would lead to sex, and then they would be paid and leave. I'm just going off memory here.
Very likely was some shady stuff going on with the people in his orbit as well. But satanic child sacrifice and drinking their blood? All from some anonymous source on 4chan of all places? Come on.
Do share the links though for those sources, I'll check it out
ya'll talkin about teh letter, that is my favoreet letter, it's so significant dawg :3
Q's an insider who mixes truth with lies, many real things were exposed but the water was muddied. He was able to gain public trust and convince them to 'trust the plan' aka be complacent. So basically a fed who got some republicans to simmer down by convincing them that they knew what was going on
So why mix in lies?
And does that mean Q is a leftist if he wanted Republicans to settle down?
Is he one of the monsters he describes?
It made people who might have stood up to the incoming tyranny sit around and do nothing because "The rich people are going to take care of it for you." They mix lies in with the truth so truth is associated with lies.
Didn't they actually attack the Capitol with Q flags? I dont think it went down quite how you described, quite the opposite actually. Q possibly bears the most blame of all for what happened.
That attack on the Capitol was a false flag hoax operation.
We're supposed to believe, according to mainstream media, this group of people stormed into a federal building in DC, occupied the building for between 3 1/2 - 6 hours, and nobody showed up to stop or arrest them. They have pictures taken with actual photographer grade cameras too, so they brought photographers with them to post pictures online that were used to "arrest" them later. Instead of, you know, surrounding the building with tanks and hellicopters and shooting everyone.
That's the level of security in the capital of the country? And these people all just went out and documented themselves with professional grade camera equipment committing treason for absolutely no reason? The Q tie in screams HOAX.
I think that having Q follow P was a wise decision on someone's part. It just seems it was meant to go there.
I just think it's hilarious how much the right despise helping the poor, so much so that Q actually becomes plausible to them.
Left: Hey, can we have healthcare like, you know, all the other civilized countries not in de facto dictatorships?
Right: You want to raise my taxes don't you, you monster.
Left: Well we kind of thought we could probably just reallocate existing taxes to better things than war. I mean we could half our military budget and still have a budget bigger than China and Russia combined. But if we did need to raise them a bit, it kind of seems acceptable to SAVE LIVES and you'd actually save money by not paying for private healthcare.
Right: Never gonna work!
Left: It's literally, you know, working... like, everywhere... and other countries are starting to laugh at us.
Right: YOU ARE EVILLLL! YOU MUST WORSHIP SATAN AND DRINK BABY BLOOD UNDERGROUND! THERE IS NO OTHER EXPLANATION! WANTING A BETTER LIFE FOR OTHERS!? NOTHING HAS EVER BEEN WORSE! EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT IS PART OF A SECRET PEDOPHILE RING PLOTTING WORLD DOMINATION!!!
It's a thoroughly debunked far-right conspiracy cult that believes the left worship Satan and drink baby blood, basically. The leader makes prediction after prediction that never comes true yet they somehow keep believing it.
They believe a day is coming when basically all Democrats are suddenly going to be arrested and tossed in jail. Already didn't happen over and over. They just move the date. Currently the 4th of March I believe.
By banning them you are causing them to belive in it more. Because they would only be banned because they are saying the truth in their mind. Let crazy people preach on the sidewalk. Not like Q has that much influence anyway.
What do you suggest? They have enough influence to get into the capitol building in a mob. And Q sprang up just 2 or 3 years ago. So how should we deal with that
Allowing them to talk in the sunlight. They are crazy, normal people see them as crazy. Allow for natural social stigma. Forcing it just reinforces the crazy people thinking that they are correct because it's the goverment/ large corporations doing it instead of the public.
Allow people to be crazy in the day light. It's a hell of a lot easier to keep track of them then to censor them and then they use an encrypted site to talk to eachother furthering the increase in crazy ideas.
That's a fair point. The problem is there doesn't seem to be any hope for that crowd. The go down that rabbit hole, most never come out. And it grows.
Maybe you're right. I'm not really sure one way or the other, but you have made a convincing argument.
They already experience the social stigma. I monitor their groups all the time and at this point the main reason they want "the storm" to come is because, "I can't wait to see the look on everyone's face when they see I'm not crazy. We'll see who the family nutjob is January 6th!"
That sounds good on paper but it doesn't work. Let people believe the moon landings didn't happen. We have one here. Everyone thinks he's an idiot for it. Changes nothing. Flat-Earthers? Hell, saying you bet someone is a flat-Earther when they're being stupid is a common insult now. It's basically synonymous with "profoundly stupid". They don't care.
None of that is physically dangerous though. Q helped lead to an attack on the United States Capitol that left death in its wake already. They're still crazy, plotting things, and the group serves as an on-ramp to more dangerous groups as well.
They have to be censored just like other dangerous groups. Censorship is never a happy moment but life and safety come first.
The only prediction that always comes true is when I wake up in the morning, and say, "I PREDICT MY CAT WILL BE AWESOME TODAY"!
The Qanon people. The ones who think there's a satanic child sacrifice pedophile organization in control of the govt. AKA wackos