Were the actions of this woman morally justified?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

← View full post
Comments ( 1 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • 1. She had no choice to take her own action as the police would not listen which leads to:
    2. Therefore she had to higher a contractor or a detective.
    3. She was morally incorrect to higher the contractor as the contractor could have killed an innocent person whereas the detective would have forced the police to take action.

    Overall the woman would not be completely guilty because she had to take her own steps as the police would not listen. She could have reported the police but there is then the question that the police could have been in trouble and in turn caused more trouble for her.

    There are so many problems arising from this kind of scenario but personally I think the woman was morally correct in the end as the suspect turned out to be a murderer/rapist so killing the suspect did more good to society than going through the normal proceedings and would have also done economically good to society as well - saving court hearings and if guilty, the money to pay for a death sentence (if legal in the country or state).

    Comment Hidden ( show )