I don't think so. She ought to have kept contacting the police until they eventually listened to her.
For all she knew, the harasser could have been a prank caller.
You say this is about the woman's actions, not the contractor's. I say because the woman hired the contractor knowing the contractor's ability and intentions, she is morally responsible for everything he did; the two are bound together. I believe killing a man without a trial is always unjust, and she is as responsible for his murder as the contractor is.
Were the actions of this woman morally justified?
← View full post
I don't think so. She ought to have kept contacting the police until they eventually listened to her.
For all she knew, the harasser could have been a prank caller.
You say this is about the woman's actions, not the contractor's. I say because the woman hired the contractor knowing the contractor's ability and intentions, she is morally responsible for everything he did; the two are bound together. I believe killing a man without a trial is always unjust, and she is as responsible for his murder as the contractor is.
--
dom180
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Btw, good question OP.