You misunderstand my motivation for "backing out," so to speak.
For the most part, I just stopped responding. Mainly because you type like an absolute fucking retard...and in 50,000 word increments. I don't have the patience to first read it, then attempt to translate it to basic English (which would take forever), then respond to your repetitive, pedantic dumb-fuckery.
I also think that you are an absolute fucktard, and I personally have no motivation to prove you wrong because you will incessintly argue every point you make into the ground, and call it a victory when others stop responding out of sheer exhaustion.
At this juncture, there are very few people on this site that even bother to read your asinine, whingy, masculinist bullshit.
I hope you go away, to other whingy corners of the internet, cause you aren't welcomed here.
Your reason for not responding to me was that I type like a "retard". Your arguement is destroyed by your latest response to me and how you understood every word. You then say that part of the reason for you backing out was my long responses. In the comment section which I base my "backing out" statement on I did not type out long comments. So you're lying.
We can keep going. You can do this if you want and I can just show you wrong everytime. That won't change, it never will. Hence why you resort to emotional tactics over rational ones...Which is even more of a terrible tactic to take when against me. But hey, let me set the mood because words hurt:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EQ6eHeBrhM
Because he can only see his own perspective and is apparently completely oblivious to the fact that there can be different perspectives without one negating the other.
I can't believe you didn't catch on what I was doing there. You confuse perspective with accuracy. You can't have two conflicting perspectives co-exist and be valid at the same time. You can have a different perspective but that doesn't make that perspective an accurate one. I really don't know how else I can explain it. Can there be subjects that have non-conflicting perspectives? Sure however you seem to think you can just apply it to any case with two different perspectives on the subject and that two perspectives, despite being contradictory, can exist without one of those perspectives being wrong.
You seem to think that "that's my preference" is an undefeatable defense and that if anyone challenges those preferences then they must not be able to see the perspectives of others.
And I can direct you to your own comment which shows you comprehend every word I type even though you've stated the same thing as those four people. I could also link you to more than four people that understand what I type by responding in context to what I type. However we'd be here all day proving an irrelevant point. You'd rather argue the presentation rather than the topic...You're very much an "examine the finger and not the moon" type of person aren't you?
I fully acknowledge there is work to be done on my presentation but to claim that what I type is retarded or incapable of reading is an exaggeration.
website similar to "is it normal"
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
You misunderstand my motivation for "backing out," so to speak.
For the most part, I just stopped responding. Mainly because you type like an absolute fucking retard...and in 50,000 word increments. I don't have the patience to first read it, then attempt to translate it to basic English (which would take forever), then respond to your repetitive, pedantic dumb-fuckery.
I also think that you are an absolute fucktard, and I personally have no motivation to prove you wrong because you will incessintly argue every point you make into the ground, and call it a victory when others stop responding out of sheer exhaustion.
At this juncture, there are very few people on this site that even bother to read your asinine, whingy, masculinist bullshit.
I hope you go away, to other whingy corners of the internet, cause you aren't welcomed here.
--
[Old Memory]
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
Your reason for not responding to me was that I type like a "retard". Your arguement is destroyed by your latest response to me and how you understood every word. You then say that part of the reason for you backing out was my long responses. In the comment section which I base my "backing out" statement on I did not type out long comments. So you're lying.
We can keep going. You can do this if you want and I can just show you wrong everytime. That won't change, it never will. Hence why you resort to emotional tactics over rational ones...Which is even more of a terrible tactic to take when against me. But hey, let me set the mood because words hurt:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EQ6eHeBrhM
:'(
--
CountessDouche
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I can send you a link of more than four people basically telling you that you type like a retard.
Send me a link of me "backing out"
--
charli.m
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
-
[Old Memory]
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
GigglyGirl
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Because he can only see his own perspective and is apparently completely oblivious to the fact that there can be different perspectives without one negating the other.
--
[Old Memory]
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
That's your perspective. That doesn't mean it's the only accurate way to look at it.
--
charli.m
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Finally, you get it.
Now you need to realise that it also applies to YOU.
And that asking you to see from a different perspective isn't someone saying "yours is wrong".
But what would I know. You're the expert on everything.
--
[Old Memory]
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
I can't believe you didn't catch on what I was doing there. You confuse perspective with accuracy. You can't have two conflicting perspectives co-exist and be valid at the same time. You can have a different perspective but that doesn't make that perspective an accurate one. I really don't know how else I can explain it. Can there be subjects that have non-conflicting perspectives? Sure however you seem to think you can just apply it to any case with two different perspectives on the subject and that two perspectives, despite being contradictory, can exist without one of those perspectives being wrong.
You seem to think that "that's my preference" is an undefeatable defense and that if anyone challenges those preferences then they must not be able to see the perspectives of others.
Ahhh, sarcasm at the end. Lovely.
And I can direct you to your own comment which shows you comprehend every word I type even though you've stated the same thing as those four people. I could also link you to more than four people that understand what I type by responding in context to what I type. However we'd be here all day proving an irrelevant point. You'd rather argue the presentation rather than the topic...You're very much an "examine the finger and not the moon" type of person aren't you?
I fully acknowledge there is work to be done on my presentation but to claim that what I type is retarded or incapable of reading is an exaggeration.
Link: http://isitnormal.com/poll/is-being-intelligent-hard-when-the-environment-youre-in-isnt-191454/
*giggles*