Ok, I get you now. Idk why I thought you meant there were no consequences for the first two. I'm a tard.
I wasn't trying to defend them, just to be clear. Emotionally, this is one of the few things I'd be for the death penalty about. Just, intellectually, I can understand that perhaps with treatment, they could be encouraged to not act on urges. But you are quite right - it is ultimately down to their choice.
Nothing wrong with lengthiness if you're saying something important.
Unpopular opinions on random stuff
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Ok, I get you now. Idk why I thought you meant there were no consequences for the first two. I'm a tard.
I wasn't trying to defend them, just to be clear. Emotionally, this is one of the few things I'd be for the death penalty about. Just, intellectually, I can understand that perhaps with treatment, they could be encouraged to not act on urges. But you are quite right - it is ultimately down to their choice.
Nothing wrong with lengthiness if you're saying something important.
--
[Old Memory]
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Do you think there's a point where you would say, "That person has no chance of rehabilitation"?
--
charli.m
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Probably. But I don't feel like humans are unbiased/incorruptible enough to make the decision to end someone's life.
I don't think those are the words I want to use I just can't think of anything better right now.