Have you ever taken a statistics class? It's an interesting subject, and by no means do I deem myself an expert, but I did learn quite a few interesting things.
For example, people tend to jump to cause and effect type conclusions, when causal relationships are, in actuality, quite hard to prove, but people tend to attribute spurious outliers causal significance when they merely happen to have a direct relationship with their desired effect...
Typical example, bear with me here...when it's hot outside people eat more ice cream. When it's hot outside people commit more crimes...therefor, ice cream leads to crime. Statistically accurate, but totally wrong.
If your stats there are true, did you ever consider that fact, that by it's nature, anal sex, often resulting in fissures, is more likely to transmit any sexually transmitted disease to the recipient, as opposed to vaginal or oral sex, which probably, by the nature of the sex in question, more likely to result in higher rates of transmitted HIV. So your stats here may have more to do with the nature of sexual intercourse than the people who happen to be engaging in said intercourse. Of course, it's easy to read that statistics with a moral slant, and assume all homo trannies get aids, but perhaps you should have a think about the veracity of the information you present and the context in which you present it, because it seems mighty slanted to me.
Transgender people....
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Have you ever taken a statistics class? It's an interesting subject, and by no means do I deem myself an expert, but I did learn quite a few interesting things.
For example, people tend to jump to cause and effect type conclusions, when causal relationships are, in actuality, quite hard to prove, but people tend to attribute spurious outliers causal significance when they merely happen to have a direct relationship with their desired effect...
Typical example, bear with me here...when it's hot outside people eat more ice cream. When it's hot outside people commit more crimes...therefor, ice cream leads to crime. Statistically accurate, but totally wrong.
If your stats there are true, did you ever consider that fact, that by it's nature, anal sex, often resulting in fissures, is more likely to transmit any sexually transmitted disease to the recipient, as opposed to vaginal or oral sex, which probably, by the nature of the sex in question, more likely to result in higher rates of transmitted HIV. So your stats here may have more to do with the nature of sexual intercourse than the people who happen to be engaging in said intercourse. Of course, it's easy to read that statistics with a moral slant, and assume all homo trannies get aids, but perhaps you should have a think about the veracity of the information you present and the context in which you present it, because it seems mighty slanted to me.