Well personally I like nonlinear narrative, also, as with a lot of non linear narratives it's open to speculation but I'll give my idea,
I'm not able to explain every single thing about the ending as it shifts from linear narrative into metaphor, but also, we're dealing with the next step in human evolution fueled by something that may be beyond human comprehension, so a confusing ending as actually very fitting
It's a film about the next steps of the evolution of mankind, the whole way through the film the monoliths have been tracking and aiding human progress, and cultural and evolutionary benchmarks, apes using tools, traversing other planets and getting to the distance in the galaxy of the final monolith
My interpretation of the final 30ish mins of the film is Dave taking that next step in human evolution, being transported to an almost zoo like area containing all the things the monolith has advanced, showing him while being transported there knowledge beyond our comprehemsiom, creation of the universe etc
Just before Adam dies the monothith appears again to him and as he does transforms him into the starchild, the beginning of the next step
Here's where I'm conflicted, the final images of the film are either literal, the starchild has been sent back to earth to finish the monoliths work, or its all metaphor, its a metaphorical image of the birth of the new human race, shown to us as a metaphor because our minds wouldn't be able to comprehend it, at least not until after the next step in human advancement
I appreciate that.
I'm a very literal kind of guy, great at fixing things, building and operating them. Not so good on the artistic end, creating art or music.
I read books and watch movies because I want the story teller to explain everything to me, not make me imagine an ending to his story. If I'm going to have to imagine the end, I might as well write the whole thing.
The worst movie ending ever...
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
That's actually one of my all time favourite endings
--
thegypsysailor
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Then perhaps you can tell me what the hell is it all supposed to mean?
--
kingofcarrotflowers
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well personally I like nonlinear narrative, also, as with a lot of non linear narratives it's open to speculation but I'll give my idea,
I'm not able to explain every single thing about the ending as it shifts from linear narrative into metaphor, but also, we're dealing with the next step in human evolution fueled by something that may be beyond human comprehension, so a confusing ending as actually very fitting
It's a film about the next steps of the evolution of mankind, the whole way through the film the monoliths have been tracking and aiding human progress, and cultural and evolutionary benchmarks, apes using tools, traversing other planets and getting to the distance in the galaxy of the final monolith
My interpretation of the final 30ish mins of the film is Dave taking that next step in human evolution, being transported to an almost zoo like area containing all the things the monolith has advanced, showing him while being transported there knowledge beyond our comprehemsiom, creation of the universe etc
Just before Adam dies the monothith appears again to him and as he does transforms him into the starchild, the beginning of the next step
Here's where I'm conflicted, the final images of the film are either literal, the starchild has been sent back to earth to finish the monoliths work, or its all metaphor, its a metaphorical image of the birth of the new human race, shown to us as a metaphor because our minds wouldn't be able to comprehend it, at least not until after the next step in human advancement
--
thegypsysailor
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I appreciate that.
I'm a very literal kind of guy, great at fixing things, building and operating them. Not so good on the artistic end, creating art or music.
I read books and watch movies because I want the story teller to explain everything to me, not make me imagine an ending to his story. If I'm going to have to imagine the end, I might as well write the whole thing.
--
ArmusWasTheFirstTroll
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I won't apologize for my earlier comment. I was out of line. Sorry.
--
CDmale4fem
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Do you mean "want" ? Otherwise your comment doesnt make sense.
--
ArmusWasTheFirstTroll
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Damn phone!
That is the exact opposite of what I intended to mean.
Yes. "Want to" was my intention.