It doesn't prove ANYTHING about the true scale of us. As I explained, we call things 'flat' all the time that are not truly flat, but it's flat to US. Paper, a DVD, a slab of granite, whatever...they're flat things. But if you were some tiny, teensy being, those things aren't flat.Who's to say that we're not microscopic to another larger being or not even a being, just a huge universe that we have zero concept of, so on SOME scale, all this round and dimensional crap we see is seen as flat to something else. In another perspective, the Earth can be flat or part of a flat 'thing'.
We measure things comparing them to US or what we can comprehend, but our measurements mean nothing to anything besides a human. What's a mile? What's a mile to an ant? It doesn't mean shit. Humans are too self absorbed to understand what I'm saying I guess.
Now you're not asking a question. NOW, you are shoving false information down our throats to try and prove your own stupid theories that have no way of being true.
If the world was seen from far, far away, it would look like a small speck of dust. Whoever was looking at us from that scale could look down on us from a microscope, and see that no matter the scale, the planets are round. It appears to be flat, but it isn't.
Look at the results of the poll. No one completely agreed with you. 20 are completely against you.
That's not true, I am very interested in seeing firstly if anyone agreed with me, secondly WHY the people who DO disagree, disagree, and to clear up misunderstandings people got from my post. When I reply it's usually because the poster didn't fully understand what I was saying and I just want to clarify things.
You're still not understanding what I'm saying. Yes, it's obviously not flat, but from larger perspectives, it would appear flat, or as a part of a flat thing.
False information? Um, what's false? Do you have some sort of proof that no one else knows about the true scale of the universe and beyond? Oh, you don't? Oh, OK, just checking. I said nothing false.
The World Is Flat!!
← View full post
So where does the Foucault Pendulum fit in then eh?
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It doesn't prove ANYTHING about the true scale of us. As I explained, we call things 'flat' all the time that are not truly flat, but it's flat to US. Paper, a DVD, a slab of granite, whatever...they're flat things. But if you were some tiny, teensy being, those things aren't flat.Who's to say that we're not microscopic to another larger being or not even a being, just a huge universe that we have zero concept of, so on SOME scale, all this round and dimensional crap we see is seen as flat to something else. In another perspective, the Earth can be flat or part of a flat 'thing'.
We measure things comparing them to US or what we can comprehend, but our measurements mean nothing to anything besides a human. What's a mile? What's a mile to an ant? It doesn't mean shit. Humans are too self absorbed to understand what I'm saying I guess.
--
K16124
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Now you're not asking a question. NOW, you are shoving false information down our throats to try and prove your own stupid theories that have no way of being true.
If the world was seen from far, far away, it would look like a small speck of dust. Whoever was looking at us from that scale could look down on us from a microscope, and see that no matter the scale, the planets are round. It appears to be flat, but it isn't.
Look at the results of the poll. No one completely agreed with you. 20 are completely against you.
--
Angel_in_a_Glass_Dress
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
this.
The OP clearly does not want to hear opposing views.
I mean why bother asking if it's normal if they only want to hear people agree with them, eh?
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
That's not true, I am very interested in seeing firstly if anyone agreed with me, secondly WHY the people who DO disagree, disagree, and to clear up misunderstandings people got from my post. When I reply it's usually because the poster didn't fully understand what I was saying and I just want to clarify things.
--
Angel_in_a_Glass_Dress
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
and in your case the Foucault Pendulum still defies your theories.
if the world was flat then it wouldn't behave as it does.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You're still not understanding what I'm saying. Yes, it's obviously not flat, but from larger perspectives, it would appear flat, or as a part of a flat thing.
False information? Um, what's false? Do you have some sort of proof that no one else knows about the true scale of the universe and beyond? Oh, you don't? Oh, OK, just checking. I said nothing false.
--
800imawesome
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
What's false is that you claim that if you're far smaller than something, it seems round to you.