No I mostly agree with you, but you're adding an element that I don't think is necessary to the definition, namely, self-interest.
I think it's clear if we put it in Freud's terms. The id represents our base desires (fulfilling self-interest), our ego is that which acts upon it, and our superego judges, conditions, and justifies.
I'd argue that morality is solely the superego, but instead of it being some sort of Freudian paternal manifestation, the motives of the superego are concerned with upholding social fluidity.
I'm not yet sold on morality as a purely human construct, but I'm willing to be persuaded.
the nature of morality
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
No I mostly agree with you, but you're adding an element that I don't think is necessary to the definition, namely, self-interest.
I think it's clear if we put it in Freud's terms. The id represents our base desires (fulfilling self-interest), our ego is that which acts upon it, and our superego judges, conditions, and justifies.
I'd argue that morality is solely the superego, but instead of it being some sort of Freudian paternal manifestation, the motives of the superego are concerned with upholding social fluidity.
I'm not yet sold on morality as a purely human construct, but I'm willing to be persuaded.