No, it is not normal. Furry "fans" make up less than 0.025% (2 million) of the estimated worldwide population (8 billion) and 50+% is what governs a normalcy. Many people are fan of fable in various cultures, although this does not constitute they are furry. Furthermore, the sexual attraction towards animal sex roleplay is a mental ailment professionally known as "autozoophilia". I should also add "furry fandom" is not really a fandom, at least not for its archetypal description, it is rather a community of autozoophiles/zoophiles, therians/otherkin, fursuiters and cartoon/fable/funny/talking animal fans.
Normal doesn't mean 50%+. This would mean that being male is not normal, because only (roughly) 48% of people are male.
And I don't see how the furry fandom is not a fandom per se. The definition seems perfectly fitting to me.
The Furry Fandom. Do you consider it normal?
← View full post
No, it is not normal. Furry "fans" make up less than 0.025% (2 million) of the estimated worldwide population (8 billion) and 50+% is what governs a normalcy. Many people are fan of fable in various cultures, although this does not constitute they are furry. Furthermore, the sexual attraction towards animal sex roleplay is a mental ailment professionally known as "autozoophilia". I should also add "furry fandom" is not really a fandom, at least not for its archetypal description, it is rather a community of autozoophiles/zoophiles, therians/otherkin, fursuiters and cartoon/fable/funny/talking animal fans.
--
GreyWulfen
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Normal doesn't mean 50%+. This would mean that being male is not normal, because only (roughly) 48% of people are male.
And I don't see how the furry fandom is not a fandom per se. The definition seems perfectly fitting to me.