Honestly I would not recommend visiting the crime ridden parts of chicago, not because they are dangerous but because they are relatively safe during the day and there is noting to do there. Subsequently you would just end up visiting the cooler and even safer parts of chicago which would be a counterproductive teaching moment.
I really wasn't implying the crime ridden part although one and the same as the poor and homeless areas.
Personally I would not recommend taking kids to any high crime areas in any country. I thought we were taking about places where people don't have all the luxuries of life that 1st world countries have.
Are you trying to say high crime is what makes an area 3rd world? I'd reverse it and say third world conditions are what leads to high crime. But even that is not always true.
My point was some poor 3rd world countries aren't necessarily un-happy places unless you apply 1st world standards.
You have to have something to compare it to. If nobody has a car or smart phone you really don't know how to miss it.
By the way it's been a while since I've been to Chicago but do the homeless and hungry go away also during the day. They only bring the shelters and feeding places out at night. Where do they go. Damn fakers they have a good life and luxury house during the day to go to.
The homeless and hungry are still active during the day in the Loop, but my understanding is that when you are poor and living in a shabby part of town, crime rates will also follow. I dont feel unsafe driving through west Garfield park and Austin during the day (I often do to avoid traffic) but those places are pitiful with the lowest life expectancy rates in chicago and high crime rates.
Taking my kids to third world country
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Honestly I would not recommend visiting the crime ridden parts of chicago, not because they are dangerous but because they are relatively safe during the day and there is noting to do there. Subsequently you would just end up visiting the cooler and even safer parts of chicago which would be a counterproductive teaching moment.
--
darefu
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I really wasn't implying the crime ridden part although one and the same as the poor and homeless areas.
Personally I would not recommend taking kids to any high crime areas in any country. I thought we were taking about places where people don't have all the luxuries of life that 1st world countries have.
Are you trying to say high crime is what makes an area 3rd world? I'd reverse it and say third world conditions are what leads to high crime. But even that is not always true.
My point was some poor 3rd world countries aren't necessarily un-happy places unless you apply 1st world standards.
You have to have something to compare it to. If nobody has a car or smart phone you really don't know how to miss it.
By the way it's been a while since I've been to Chicago but do the homeless and hungry go away also during the day. They only bring the shelters and feeding places out at night. Where do they go. Damn fakers they have a good life and luxury house during the day to go to.
--
BleedingPain
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The homeless and hungry are still active during the day in the Loop, but my understanding is that when you are poor and living in a shabby part of town, crime rates will also follow. I dont feel unsafe driving through west Garfield park and Austin during the day (I often do to avoid traffic) but those places are pitiful with the lowest life expectancy rates in chicago and high crime rates.