Men don't have easier lives. Unfortunatly, society has begun to indirectly attack men for everything, despite their contribution that shows them to be more capable of evolving our species and civilization.
I believe males as a gender are superior, but as individuals it isn't the same. There are millions of females smarter than me, achieve greatness than I can, and done it fairly and desrve their wealth.
Their are more dumb males than dumb females, but there are more smart and smarter males than there are smart females.
As it stands, males are the best and the worst.
I also believe that females shouldn't be able to lead the masses, I believe they are too emotional for it. There are a lot of tough decisions that go against morality in seats of power, decisions that have to be made, and I doubt women are capable of doing so as much as men. I mean, today's society basically babies females by giving them so much "Aww, poor female" attention. They get off with everything, they get special privelages, and they want "Equality" without males sharing their positive sides.
I personally believe the world should go back to the way males and females used to be, with gender roles. Obviously they would have more rights, which would be good for males aswell. People don't realize that when women were opressed, men also had negatives of it aswell. If a woman that was married done anything wrong against society, the man she is married to would of been basically blamed for it, because he had to have her under control to not do anything negative against society.
If we went back to gender roles, we would have so much better/more brought up children.
But, I believe the male gender is superior to the female gender.
If we were seperated in to different areas, males would progress better and faster in making civilization. I seen someone say males would attack eachother constantly if this happened, but I dissagree, to an extent. Yes, you would get quite a few people fighting for power, butthe majority of males would work together to build. I mean, have you seen builders today? They work together, and that's how it would be. I believe there would be a struggle for alpha dog at the start, but once one is chosen, males would progress a lot.
It would be harder for women because they would have to get their own food, make their own tools, use their less strength, and have tofight other species that are stronger than them, so I believe they won't be able to survive as well as the males.
There are more parts I would include, but I've said enough.
Sorry, I don't wish to be controlled by my husband. I feel that I am very intelligent and have just as much to contribute to our lives as he does. I am willing to take responsibility for my failings and I admit, I care more about properly raising my children than I do about my career. I don't consider myself a lesser person for me, I know men with that disposition as well.
I like many of your main points and I usually agree with what you say, but I don't need my husband controlling me. I have gotten this far without a man having to hold my hand the whole way, obviously my vagina isn't THAT big of a hinderance to what I am capable of =/ But maybe I am misunderstanding you.
That's why I said the part that involved them having rights, so their partner couldn't control them.
That's why I think gender roles should be made. Women take more interest in raising children, where as males take more interest in work, neither are bad.
I don't mean it as in men can just say "Go do this, go do that". I don't wish for it to be like that. I do however wish that in a married couple that have children that women take care of the kids (such is their nature).
What about those women who don't want children. Like, I HATE babies, and there's no way in hell that I want one. Not all women are emotional. And I don't think anyone is superior to anyone. Personally, I think we're all bags of shit men and women alike. People are always talking about not seeing color, well it's time to stop seeing sex too. People are people. Straight and too the point. And I don't need a man in my life to surive. I can take care of myself. Straight and to the point. I've come this far having never been in a relationship and I will go even further when I become successful and follow my dream. Who gives a shit about raising a family?! There's a reason why the 50's are over. And if I had to live with "gender roles" I'd goudge my eye out with a screw driver!
That's terribly unfair to the women that have no desire to have children. That just puts us where maternal men are in our society, backwards and improper as opposed to admirable.
Ah. Well then your plan would still screw me over as you can see, I am married and my husband and I are not yet in the financial position to have children as we are both working our way through college. If I were to settle and have children right now, the rent would not get paid and we would become homeless =/
Hmm. Don't take this the wrong way, but perhaps hold off the child idea until you and your husband are in a safe part of life where only one has to work and other can take care of the child?
you realize that by saying that there are more dumb males than females and more smart males than females, your saying that there are generally more males than females....right?
I think ItDuz was saying men tend towards the extremes while women are more average. I'm not sure I agree, but there's nothing illogical about holding that position.
In the worldwide population, there are more females than males.
The way I interpreted his post is that there are more outliers; people with above and below average intelligence among the males than among the females.
I know what he was trying to say. [Like you mentioned, that females allegedly tend to waver around the average intelligence index, while males are more likely to fair either below average or significantly above average] BUT he said it haphazardly, and it made little sense. Beside the matter, there's no conclusive evidence to argue either of those points.
And since female infanticide has become staggeringly popular, the world population favors males ever so slightly.
Sometimes I wish I were a male
← View full post
Men don't have easier lives. Unfortunatly, society has begun to indirectly attack men for everything, despite their contribution that shows them to be more capable of evolving our species and civilization.
I believe males as a gender are superior, but as individuals it isn't the same. There are millions of females smarter than me, achieve greatness than I can, and done it fairly and desrve their wealth.
Their are more dumb males than dumb females, but there are more smart and smarter males than there are smart females.
As it stands, males are the best and the worst.
I also believe that females shouldn't be able to lead the masses, I believe they are too emotional for it. There are a lot of tough decisions that go against morality in seats of power, decisions that have to be made, and I doubt women are capable of doing so as much as men. I mean, today's society basically babies females by giving them so much "Aww, poor female" attention. They get off with everything, they get special privelages, and they want "Equality" without males sharing their positive sides.
I personally believe the world should go back to the way males and females used to be, with gender roles. Obviously they would have more rights, which would be good for males aswell. People don't realize that when women were opressed, men also had negatives of it aswell. If a woman that was married done anything wrong against society, the man she is married to would of been basically blamed for it, because he had to have her under control to not do anything negative against society.
If we went back to gender roles, we would have so much better/more brought up children.
But, I believe the male gender is superior to the female gender.
If we were seperated in to different areas, males would progress better and faster in making civilization. I seen someone say males would attack eachother constantly if this happened, but I dissagree, to an extent. Yes, you would get quite a few people fighting for power, butthe majority of males would work together to build. I mean, have you seen builders today? They work together, and that's how it would be. I believe there would be a struggle for alpha dog at the start, but once one is chosen, males would progress a lot.
It would be harder for women because they would have to get their own food, make their own tools, use their less strength, and have tofight other species that are stronger than them, so I believe they won't be able to survive as well as the males.
There are more parts I would include, but I've said enough.
--
NeuroNeptunian
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
-
thinkingaboutit
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
TheSecret
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Huh.
Sorry, I don't wish to be controlled by my husband. I feel that I am very intelligent and have just as much to contribute to our lives as he does. I am willing to take responsibility for my failings and I admit, I care more about properly raising my children than I do about my career. I don't consider myself a lesser person for me, I know men with that disposition as well.
I like many of your main points and I usually agree with what you say, but I don't need my husband controlling me. I have gotten this far without a man having to hold my hand the whole way, obviously my vagina isn't THAT big of a hinderance to what I am capable of =/ But maybe I am misunderstanding you.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That's why I said the part that involved them having rights, so their partner couldn't control them.
That's why I think gender roles should be made. Women take more interest in raising children, where as males take more interest in work, neither are bad.
I don't mean it as in men can just say "Go do this, go do that". I don't wish for it to be like that. I do however wish that in a married couple that have children that women take care of the kids (such is their nature).
--
KeddersPrincess
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
NeuroNeptunian
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
What about those women who don't want children. Like, I HATE babies, and there's no way in hell that I want one. Not all women are emotional. And I don't think anyone is superior to anyone. Personally, I think we're all bags of shit men and women alike. People are always talking about not seeing color, well it's time to stop seeing sex too. People are people. Straight and too the point. And I don't need a man in my life to surive. I can take care of myself. Straight and to the point. I've come this far having never been in a relationship and I will go even further when I become successful and follow my dream. Who gives a shit about raising a family?! There's a reason why the 50's are over. And if I had to live with "gender roles" I'd goudge my eye out with a screw driver!
That's terribly unfair to the women that have no desire to have children. That just puts us where maternal men are in our society, backwards and improper as opposed to admirable.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Women with no children can go to any job they want. I was meaning the married woman.
--
NeuroNeptunian
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Ah. Well then your plan would still screw me over as you can see, I am married and my husband and I are not yet in the financial position to have children as we are both working our way through college. If I were to settle and have children right now, the rent would not get paid and we would become homeless =/
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Hmm. Don't take this the wrong way, but perhaps hold off the child idea until you and your husband are in a safe part of life where only one has to work and other can take care of the child?
you realize that by saying that there are more dumb males than females and more smart males than females, your saying that there are generally more males than females....right?
I just thought that sounded silly :)
--
Couman
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
GuessWho
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I think ItDuz was saying men tend towards the extremes while women are more average. I'm not sure I agree, but there's nothing illogical about holding that position.
In the worldwide population, there are more females than males.
The way I interpreted his post is that there are more outliers; people with above and below average intelligence among the males than among the females.
--
thinkingaboutit
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I know what he was trying to say. [Like you mentioned, that females allegedly tend to waver around the average intelligence index, while males are more likely to fair either below average or significantly above average] BUT he said it haphazardly, and it made little sense. Beside the matter, there's no conclusive evidence to argue either of those points.
And since female infanticide has become staggeringly popular, the world population favors males ever so slightly.
I agree with all parts.
So are you saying that it's normal for me to want to be a male? Even if I'm not lesbian or bi?
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I suppose it's normal. You like the idea of the male, not their sexual partners.