The difference between the comment situation and the McDonald's situation is that llamalover was responding to a post about whether gay people are very "in your face" about their sexuality or not, while in the McDonald's situation, the information was arbitrarily given. It is important to distinguish if adding that you are gay will be beneficial to the discussion, or whether it will not. In llamalover's case, it added to the discussion. I believe that some people lack this ability to judge the situation, and, yeah, they can be annoying. However, this does not mean that every time the topic of being gay is brought up that there needs to be a disturbance.
So when are we going to be over gay people?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
The difference between the comment situation and the McDonald's situation is that llamalover was responding to a post about whether gay people are very "in your face" about their sexuality or not, while in the McDonald's situation, the information was arbitrarily given. It is important to distinguish if adding that you are gay will be beneficial to the discussion, or whether it will not. In llamalover's case, it added to the discussion. I believe that some people lack this ability to judge the situation, and, yeah, they can be annoying. However, this does not mean that every time the topic of being gay is brought up that there needs to be a disturbance.
--
Anonymous Post Author
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Like a disturbance in the Force?
No its not that serious.
I get what you are saying.