You are ignorant and no one could convince you of a more sensible opinion anyways. Strictly homosexual behaviour has been observed in a lot of animals. Example: humans. More examples: Google (over a thousand actually, look it up!). But since you're an ignorant homophobe who isn't convinced by such petty things such as facts or logic, I guess I'm just wasting my time here.
I'm ignorant? Humans are the only species that engages in strictly homosexual behavior.
If you're referring to animals that engage in bi-sexual behavior that is something different.
I explicitly mentioned STRICTLY HOMOSEXUAL behavior, because there isn't a single animal in the wild that engages in that because if they existed they would quickly go extinct because animals with the same gender cannot create offspring.
Which means that the behavior isn't natural. You can argue it all you want, but you won't find a single animal that does that.
If gay dudes are fully functional and self sufficient, I don't have a particular problem with what they do behind the closed doors of their own home that they pay for.
I do have a problem with seeing it positively reinforced in any sort of mass media.
We get it already, gays exist. Nobody is going to burn gays at the stake for their lifestyle choice. They can keep it to themselves.
You won't find a single animal who cleans its teeth with toothpaste either, or uses cutlery to eat with or toilet paper to wipe its bum .. On the basis of your argument you wouldn't be using the internet or driving a car or accessing medical treatment because animals in the wild don't do that?
Gays may not be burnt at the stake these days but they are still killed, ostracised, discriminated against and victimised for their sexuality. When straights keep their sexuality to themselves I'll agree that gay people should do the same.
Oh why am I expecting a homophobe to be logical .. will I never learn?
Why can't I have an opinion Ellena? Because you disagree with it, and because you have a liberal outlook on lifestyle choices in general, you suddenly have the high ground to label me with what you consider a negative term like "homophobe".
Everything you mentioned regarding human civilization has nothing to do with a discussion on homosexuality. Should someone who chooses to do those things that you mentioned be subjected to scorn by others who don't? Sure, they may actually be. Doesn't mean those same people have a logical viewpoint. Doesn't make the scorn any more sensible.
dumb fuck gorillas have committed homosexual acts chimpanzee's dogs wolves all animals can just as easily have gay sex. More easily in fact ignorance is bliss
Ah, quite interesting. Female to female interactions that ENHANCE ovulation. Though not quite homosexual reproduction though as it just enhances reproductive chances. Asexual reproduction is different than homosexual reproduction.
So when are we going to be over gay people?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Which is normal behavior. Homosexuality is not. Unless you'd like to prove that it is a natural behavior.
If you can name me one animal that engages in homosexual, AND STRICTLY, homosexual behavior you will have convinced me.
Also, while you're at it, you could answer this one for me. What sort of moron argues that normal behavior shouldn't be reinforced?
--
GreyWulfen
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
CountessDouche
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
You are ignorant and no one could convince you of a more sensible opinion anyways. Strictly homosexual behaviour has been observed in a lot of animals. Example: humans. More examples: Google (over a thousand actually, look it up!). But since you're an ignorant homophobe who isn't convinced by such petty things such as facts or logic, I guess I'm just wasting my time here.
--
8=====D~~~~~
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I'm ignorant? Humans are the only species that engages in strictly homosexual behavior.
If you're referring to animals that engage in bi-sexual behavior that is something different.
I explicitly mentioned STRICTLY HOMOSEXUAL behavior, because there isn't a single animal in the wild that engages in that because if they existed they would quickly go extinct because animals with the same gender cannot create offspring.
Who's ignorant again?
--
GreyWulfen
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
JojoThomas
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
So what if only humans would engage in it? What would be the issue with that? Humans are also the only animals to argue over the internet.
--
8=====D~~~~~
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Which means that the behavior isn't natural. You can argue it all you want, but you won't find a single animal that does that.
If gay dudes are fully functional and self sufficient, I don't have a particular problem with what they do behind the closed doors of their own home that they pay for.
I do have a problem with seeing it positively reinforced in any sort of mass media.
We get it already, gays exist. Nobody is going to burn gays at the stake for their lifestyle choice. They can keep it to themselves.
--
Ellenna
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
You won't find a single animal who cleans its teeth with toothpaste either, or uses cutlery to eat with or toilet paper to wipe its bum .. On the basis of your argument you wouldn't be using the internet or driving a car or accessing medical treatment because animals in the wild don't do that?
Gays may not be burnt at the stake these days but they are still killed, ostracised, discriminated against and victimised for their sexuality. When straights keep their sexuality to themselves I'll agree that gay people should do the same.
Oh why am I expecting a homophobe to be logical .. will I never learn?
--
8=====D~~~~~
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Why can't I have an opinion Ellena? Because you disagree with it, and because you have a liberal outlook on lifestyle choices in general, you suddenly have the high ground to label me with what you consider a negative term like "homophobe".
Everything you mentioned regarding human civilization has nothing to do with a discussion on homosexuality. Should someone who chooses to do those things that you mentioned be subjected to scorn by others who don't? Sure, they may actually be. Doesn't mean those same people have a logical viewpoint. Doesn't make the scorn any more sensible.
dumb fuck gorillas have committed homosexual acts chimpanzee's dogs wolves all animals can just as easily have gay sex. More easily in fact ignorance is bliss
--
8=====D~~~~~
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Your reading comprehension absolutely sucks. I'm not going back to tell you where you are wrong.
Whiptail lizards.
--
8=====D~~~~~
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ah, quite interesting. Female to female interactions that ENHANCE ovulation. Though not quite homosexual reproduction though as it just enhances reproductive chances. Asexual reproduction is different than homosexual reproduction.
That was interesting.