Everything has a purpose, if a kid was born because your rubber broke( a mistake) would you kill him just because you didnt want him? Does he not have a say ? Does he not get a chance to feel love? To have life and become someone great to change this world? You guys are just selfish, you dont have the right to say who lives or dies period.
In that instance I'd look at the parents background, if they can't look after the baby properly and the care system is poor in their area then Abortion is the one of the sensible options. It's not just the baby you need to think about, do the parents have health issues, are they capable of being good parents? Using it as Birth Control is wrong but if something has happened (Rape, Health issues) then abortion is (in some cases) the best option for the women/man and fetus. It's not selfish if you can't deal with pregnancy or having a child.
Rape? Adoption, To young? Close your legs, Parent is not in the right mind ? Govermount takes the baby and gives it to someone wishing and crying their eyes out every night because they dont have the ability to give birth. Key Point is child not parent...New life takes away old life and if your just killing new life then your killing your self...that crap effects you watch
Rape, youve got something from the person who's ruined your life, self, state of mind inside of you for roughly 9 months. Imagine what that can do to a woman?! Too young, imagine when the child finds out that their mum was a 15 yr old, or the crap the mums family would get from everyone. When you say adoption, it's emotionally distructive for a new mum to give her child away,
stop being so one sided, this subject you need to think not only of the child, but of the parents as well. They not only have to deal with pregnancy but also having a child who is possibly ill, reminds them of their hellish experience, a consequence of a mistake or even never seeing their baby, it's hard to give a child away, especially to have an abortion which is why you should think about it as much as possible before hand, people don't get laid then when their pregnant think oh well I'll just abort it.
But you HAVE to remember It's not just the fetus that's affected by abortion.
there's too many children in the system already and too many people abusing it. it needs reform as well as the loopholes in the legislature that let's bible thumpers force their beliefs on everyone
What are you trying to say, is that just because there might be, {but there ain't}, to many kids in this world, that we should just say all right we'll kill you?
Hey Mr. Atheist, if you have the right to state your atheistic beliefs then us as you called us "BIBLE THUMPERS" should have equal rights in stating our beliefs.
What's "Good For The Goose, Is Good For The Gander," if we have to listen to your beliefs then sit back and give us equal time.
i believe i have. i've read your comments and rebutted them. these are my beliefs and i'm allowed to have them, and if appropriate i'll share them. if someone is looking for a debate, i'll provide one.
That is what I am trying to state, you have as much rights to state your horrible Atheistic Beliefs and make people read them as I have with my Christian Beliefs. You see it one way I see it another, and if you want to go on a one on one debate with me on a subject I would be glad to do it through e-letters if you would like to just let me know dude. Remember my thoughts on things even though I have found out that you ultra liberals don't like them should have as much respect as your remarks so "Put That In Your Pipe and Smoke It!"
If you're so pro-life, why is it "wrong" to "murder" a human fetus, but other species are habitually and endlessly murdered in utero every day and no one apparently thinks doing the SAME THING to a mother of another species is "wrong."
An action is either wrong or not wrong - who it happens to is irrelevant and nothing but a distraction meant to draw attention away from the underlying concept.
If abortion is wrong for human women, it's wrong to force it on females of other species, too. To do otherwise is blatantly hypocritical and overtly self-serving (i.e., illogical and ethically unsupportable).
It's the same thing with slavery: it's either wrong, or not wrong. It's not wrong some of the time for some of the species on the planet, and who the enslaved happens to be is irrelevant because we are talking about the action, slavery, and not deciding its moral viability based upon who the victim happens to be, we have to decide whether slavery is wrong or not wrong based upon its morality as an action.
Show of hands, Who thinks abortion is immoral or 'Wrong'?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Everything has a purpose, if a kid was born because your rubber broke( a mistake) would you kill him just because you didnt want him? Does he not have a say ? Does he not get a chance to feel love? To have life and become someone great to change this world? You guys are just selfish, you dont have the right to say who lives or dies period.
--
Orangepeelx
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
Miss_Anthrope
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
In that instance I'd look at the parents background, if they can't look after the baby properly and the care system is poor in their area then Abortion is the one of the sensible options. It's not just the baby you need to think about, do the parents have health issues, are they capable of being good parents? Using it as Birth Control is wrong but if something has happened (Rape, Health issues) then abortion is (in some cases) the best option for the women/man and fetus. It's not selfish if you can't deal with pregnancy or having a child.
--
spacemonkeys21
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Rape? Adoption, To young? Close your legs, Parent is not in the right mind ? Govermount takes the baby and gives it to someone wishing and crying their eyes out every night because they dont have the ability to give birth. Key Point is child not parent...New life takes away old life and if your just killing new life then your killing your self...that crap effects you watch
--
Orangepeelx
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
dontpissmeoff
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Rape, youve got something from the person who's ruined your life, self, state of mind inside of you for roughly 9 months. Imagine what that can do to a woman?! Too young, imagine when the child finds out that their mum was a 15 yr old, or the crap the mums family would get from everyone. When you say adoption, it's emotionally distructive for a new mum to give her child away,
stop being so one sided, this subject you need to think not only of the child, but of the parents as well. They not only have to deal with pregnancy but also having a child who is possibly ill, reminds them of their hellish experience, a consequence of a mistake or even never seeing their baby, it's hard to give a child away, especially to have an abortion which is why you should think about it as much as possible before hand, people don't get laid then when their pregnant think oh well I'll just abort it.
But you HAVE to remember It's not just the fetus that's affected by abortion.
--
UliNalaMansae
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
dontpissmeoff
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
inuyasha4life
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
yeah! smart people!
my point exactly. thank you
Who the f&*k cares if it's emotionally destructive to the mother? You're killing a baby!
there's too many children in the system already and too many people abusing it. it needs reform as well as the loopholes in the legislature that let's bible thumpers force their beliefs on everyone
--
4392Moron
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
What are you trying to say, is that just because there might be, {but there ain't}, to many kids in this world, that we should just say all right we'll kill you?
Hey Mr. Atheist, if you have the right to state your atheistic beliefs then us as you called us "BIBLE THUMPERS" should have equal rights in stating our beliefs.
What's "Good For The Goose, Is Good For The Gander," if we have to listen to your beliefs then sit back and give us equal time.
--
dontpissmeoff
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
i believe i have. i've read your comments and rebutted them. these are my beliefs and i'm allowed to have them, and if appropriate i'll share them. if someone is looking for a debate, i'll provide one.
--
4392Moron
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
See More Comments =>
Hey Dude:
That is what I am trying to state, you have as much rights to state your horrible Atheistic Beliefs and make people read them as I have with my Christian Beliefs. You see it one way I see it another, and if you want to go on a one on one debate with me on a subject I would be glad to do it through e-letters if you would like to just let me know dude. Remember my thoughts on things even though I have found out that you ultra liberals don't like them should have as much respect as your remarks so "Put That In Your Pipe and Smoke It!"
If you're so pro-life, why is it "wrong" to "murder" a human fetus, but other species are habitually and endlessly murdered in utero every day and no one apparently thinks doing the SAME THING to a mother of another species is "wrong."
An action is either wrong or not wrong - who it happens to is irrelevant and nothing but a distraction meant to draw attention away from the underlying concept.
If abortion is wrong for human women, it's wrong to force it on females of other species, too. To do otherwise is blatantly hypocritical and overtly self-serving (i.e., illogical and ethically unsupportable).
It's the same thing with slavery: it's either wrong, or not wrong. It's not wrong some of the time for some of the species on the planet, and who the enslaved happens to be is irrelevant because we are talking about the action, slavery, and not deciding its moral viability based upon who the victim happens to be, we have to decide whether slavery is wrong or not wrong based upon its morality as an action.
So, what's it going to be?