Your main point's just not been proven true. White liberals have been shown to racially discriminate in group as opposed to out of group, i.e. they have a bias against other white liberals. Your "objective proof" is a fart in the wind, and if you seriously think that a fox news poll means science has proven conservatives promote racism more per capita than other groups then you're an ideological fanatic.
If you somehow got something about a Fox News poll from that then I don't expect your reading comprehension to suffice so as to warrant a further response not in vain either.
Not really. I assumed it was on fox news because you specifically mentioned that they were "Fox News loving Republicans". My bad, I assumed you were fair on this and wouldn't label them in a category you don't know they are unless you had proof they were "Fox News loving".
The point stands regardless; I could tell you that blacks are far more racist than whites because they're 1.5x more likely to be flagged for online hate speech by the algorithm than whites. That's far stronger evidence than your 1 poll, but even that doesn't stand as definitive proof of blacks being more racist because it's simply such a hard thing to find conclusive, wide spread evidence for.
I literally knew they did. The results actually indicated as a side note that Republicans who said they didn't like Fox News were slightly less racist on average (although still extremely racist).
Far stronger evidence? Is it? In fact, I'm aware of what you're talking about and that's never the conclusion or way it's thought about at all. In fact, it seems rather apparent that bias against blacks in the development of the algorithms leads to the results. No one really even seems to question that they're skewed. So not only is it not stronger but it potentially backfires altogether.
My data is to the point and not open to much interpretation at all. It's definitively racist to assert that one race is less deserving of standing up for themselves. There's no other way to spin this one.
Your data's pitiful compared to how hard it would be to actually get an accurate representation of the per capita amount of racism by different political groups. The fact you think it stands as stark evidence for higher levels of racism by Republicans/ conservatives is just your fanatical belief in your own ideology. You've got to be objective when looking at something like this, you're either lacking that or the basic intelligence to see the fundamental problem.
"It's definitively racist to assert that one race is less deserving of standing up for themselves."
You mean like liberals do with white people?
https://youtu.be/qbzg_2nI8Z8
^^^Chastising the st. louis couple (who met BLM at their doorstep with guns) for defending their home.
https://youtu.be/3OWZ7mN2q6M
^^^Falsely labeling the pregnant mother who pulled a gun on 2 black women accosting her & her husband calling them racial slurs & striking their car with their kids in the back of said car. A racist.
https://youtu.be/bqWC-lNTwjA
^^^Say they support Jacob Blake despite the fact he sexualy assulted his girlfriend, pulled a knife on the police & tried to steal a car with kids in the back (which they knew about) & berate the officer who shot him.
https://youtu.be/l_FYeehbodE
^^^(the funniest one) Insinuate Jack Paul is a racist for knocking out Nate Robinson in a boxing match.
Should white people pay reperations?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Your main point's just not been proven true. White liberals have been shown to racially discriminate in group as opposed to out of group, i.e. they have a bias against other white liberals. Your "objective proof" is a fart in the wind, and if you seriously think that a fox news poll means science has proven conservatives promote racism more per capita than other groups then you're an ideological fanatic.
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If you somehow got something about a Fox News poll from that then I don't expect your reading comprehension to suffice so as to warrant a further response not in vain either.
--
elpotato
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Not really. I assumed it was on fox news because you specifically mentioned that they were "Fox News loving Republicans". My bad, I assumed you were fair on this and wouldn't label them in a category you don't know they are unless you had proof they were "Fox News loving".
The point stands regardless; I could tell you that blacks are far more racist than whites because they're 1.5x more likely to be flagged for online hate speech by the algorithm than whites. That's far stronger evidence than your 1 poll, but even that doesn't stand as definitive proof of blacks being more racist because it's simply such a hard thing to find conclusive, wide spread evidence for.
--
S0UNDS_WEIRD
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
I literally knew they did. The results actually indicated as a side note that Republicans who said they didn't like Fox News were slightly less racist on average (although still extremely racist).
Far stronger evidence? Is it? In fact, I'm aware of what you're talking about and that's never the conclusion or way it's thought about at all. In fact, it seems rather apparent that bias against blacks in the development of the algorithms leads to the results. No one really even seems to question that they're skewed. So not only is it not stronger but it potentially backfires altogether.
My data is to the point and not open to much interpretation at all. It's definitively racist to assert that one race is less deserving of standing up for themselves. There's no other way to spin this one.
--
elpotato
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
ThatOneGuyYouNeverWantToMeet
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Your data's pitiful compared to how hard it would be to actually get an accurate representation of the per capita amount of racism by different political groups. The fact you think it stands as stark evidence for higher levels of racism by Republicans/ conservatives is just your fanatical belief in your own ideology. You've got to be objective when looking at something like this, you're either lacking that or the basic intelligence to see the fundamental problem.
"It's definitively racist to assert that one race is less deserving of standing up for themselves."
You mean like liberals do with white people?
https://youtu.be/qbzg_2nI8Z8
^^^Chastising the st. louis couple (who met BLM at their doorstep with guns) for defending their home.
https://youtu.be/3OWZ7mN2q6M
^^^Falsely labeling the pregnant mother who pulled a gun on 2 black women accosting her & her husband calling them racial slurs & striking their car with their kids in the back of said car. A racist.
https://youtu.be/bqWC-lNTwjA
^^^Say they support Jacob Blake despite the fact he sexualy assulted his girlfriend, pulled a knife on the police & tried to steal a car with kids in the back (which they knew about) & berate the officer who shot him.
https://youtu.be/l_FYeehbodE
^^^(the funniest one) Insinuate Jack Paul is a racist for knocking out Nate Robinson in a boxing match.