Should the twin towers just have been rebuilt instead?
Would it have been better if they just rebuilt an exact replica of the old WTC instead? Or maybe the sight of them would be too uncomfortable after 9/11?
Yeah | 12 | |
No | 14 |
Ask Your Question today
Would it have been better if they just rebuilt an exact replica of the old WTC instead? Or maybe the sight of them would be too uncomfortable after 9/11?
Yeah | 12 | |
No | 14 |
Yes I always thought they should have rebuilt them. Maybe not exact replicas but it shows strength and power that you could just knock our massive buildings down like that in our country and we can just keep rebuilding them like its nothing. Kinda symbolic some shit the romans would do.
NYC born and raised and I was in grad school during 911. I say No. I miss them, but they were both irreplaceable with the same thing imo and also if they rebuilt them the same I get the horrible feeling other attacks may be more likely to happen.
I don't really think the Twin Towers should be rebuilt it would end up getting destroyed again.
I always thought they were monstrosities anyway, so I wouldn’t want to see them rebuilt. That said, they did make a beautiful monument in their place and a beautiful building to show we won’t be stopped.
They should have been rebuilt, twice as tall as before and with a golden facade.
Naw. It would just give another target for more attacks. This time with more emotional collateral if it did succeed. The memorial route is better cost wise and decreasing the priority in attacking it.