God damn those evil men! Forcing you to become a stripper!...Oh, we're not at that part in which we blame men for women "objectifying" themseleves yet? Sorry, I'll wait.
______________________________________________________
In all seriousness, if you want to do it, you should do it. If you're doing this to get back at your ex to show him "what he's missing", then I actually find that pretty disgusting.
Rumours will most likely happen, and if it's stuff like you being a stripper that you don't want coming out, then that's going to happen most likely.
To ItDuz, mentioning how hard men have it in society every chance he gets is completely and utterly necessary. Even when men are not mentioned at all in the post, and the thought of "stripping = bad b/c woman are objectified by men" wasn't even brought up.
You know, maybe if we all just stopped responding to ItDuz's comments, do you think he'll stop?
I so agree. I saw him comment on another post the other day. The post had NOTHING to do with sex or gender but he somehow manage to twist it and made a comment about women.
To be honest, he really is getting quite annoying with it now.
He's certainly not doing the "fight for a better society for men because they truly have it so hard in the world" by constantly bringing up the subject where sex or gender aren't even mentioned.
He's making his case worse, actually. Constantly bringing it up the way he does just make him look like a misogynistic complainer; his "man > woman" & "men have it so hard" argument is starting to become a huge joke, and he has no one to blame but himself.
Actually, no. I haven't said women have it worst, I am trying to make people identify that men have it just as bad. Media shows women having it bad so much, and the whole feminist group that is mainly man-hating now gets so much media time, yet some male on a site explaining the sexism towards men and double standards is just unnacceptable and ruining their case?
"Don't speak about it, you'll ruin your point"...But I haven't explained why I came to the conclusion I have. "That doesn't matter, if you go on, you ruin your point". But if I don't go on I have no point.
I am in no way misogynistic, I have merely explained truth, and if you dissagree with that, give me an example of how I am a misogynist.
The reason why you see it as a joke is because you don't want to hear it, and assuming that you're a woman, that's completely understandable.
Do you think it's just a coinsidence that 99.9% of users on here that seem to think what I say is a joke are women? Funny that, isn't it?
Personally, I have grown to expect women to react the way you have here. Women have this whole "our gender is equal in every way, but don't treat us in every way. Oh we're so hard done to" attitude, that if anyone mentions anything that implies anything different, it's just a joke.
I am doing this for males to hear more than I am for women to hear so that they can understand, not for women. I don't care if women find it a joke, because I find such women as jokes, and I only care about the male's opinions on it because 98% of women cannot think rationally if what is being discussed involves something that is offensive to any group she belongs to (female gender).
A fine example to this is how the majority of my polls on this matter that I have given options such as:
Male - I agree
Male - I dissagee
Female - I agree
Female - I dissagree
The males tend to agree, where as, suprise suprise, the majority of females dissagree.
Don't assume just because the majority of the people that reply to me dissagree with me equals to the majority of people here dissagreeing with me, because there are far more users that don't comment and reply than those that do, and males that answer polls agree with me.
Don't assume that just because the majority of replies to me (not many all in) don't agree with me, because it seems the ones that don't comment agree with me.
Women are offended easily, and when they do, rational thinking is very rare. A fine example would be how I tested the community. I made two stories, both are different scenarios with the same reasoning, but only one mentioned women directly, where as the one that didn't involve any gender and was an everyday activity didn't mention women at all, so the part which would make them offended was gone. Both scenarious were the same situation, same reasioning, same deductive logic. The women that were offended and dissagreed so much with the female ones obviously dissagreed with me, yet a few of those people that were saying I was wrong on the women one agreed with me fully on the other scenario that had the same situation, just without the part that could offend women, and the majority agreed with me on the scenario that didn't involve women as a part of it.
Funny that, isn't it?
So again. When I speak on these subjects, it's for men to hear, women can bitch if they want, they usually can't answer my points anyway.
I clearly stated at the start that the first paragraph is off topic, which implies to just skip to the second paragaraph.
People like to blame the men that run strip clubs for strippers, so I thought I would make a half joke/half truth. A lot of people even on this site don't blame the womenchoosing to be strippers as much as the people employing women to be strippers.
Again, I clearly indicated the first paragraph was off topic.
Ugh. As if an indication to tell you not to read the top part if you want to read the part on topic was enough to make someone that doesn't want to read things off topic to...You know, skip the off topic part.
I clearly stated what was on topic and what wasn't, you decided to read it, that was your doing.
Should I become a part time stripper?
← View full post
-FIRST PARAGRAPH OFF TOPIC TO THE LINE-
God damn those evil men! Forcing you to become a stripper!...Oh, we're not at that part in which we blame men for women "objectifying" themseleves yet? Sorry, I'll wait.
______________________________________________________
In all seriousness, if you want to do it, you should do it. If you're doing this to get back at your ex to show him "what he's missing", then I actually find that pretty disgusting.
Rumours will most likely happen, and if it's stuff like you being a stripper that you don't want coming out, then that's going to happen most likely.
--
NeuroNeptunian
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
=.= Was that... was that really necessary?
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
Lynxikat
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
I didn't even understand a word he said lol.
To ItDuz, mentioning how hard men have it in society every chance he gets is completely and utterly necessary. Even when men are not mentioned at all in the post, and the thought of "stripping = bad b/c woman are objectified by men" wasn't even brought up.
You know, maybe if we all just stopped responding to ItDuz's comments, do you think he'll stop?
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I so agree. I saw him comment on another post the other day. The post had NOTHING to do with sex or gender but he somehow manage to twist it and made a comment about women.
To be honest, he really is getting quite annoying with it now.
--
Lynxikat
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
He's certainly not doing the "fight for a better society for men because they truly have it so hard in the world" by constantly bringing up the subject where sex or gender aren't even mentioned.
He's making his case worse, actually. Constantly bringing it up the way he does just make him look like a misogynistic complainer; his "man > woman" & "men have it so hard" argument is starting to become a huge joke, and he has no one to blame but himself.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Actually, no. I haven't said women have it worst, I am trying to make people identify that men have it just as bad. Media shows women having it bad so much, and the whole feminist group that is mainly man-hating now gets so much media time, yet some male on a site explaining the sexism towards men and double standards is just unnacceptable and ruining their case?
"Don't speak about it, you'll ruin your point"...But I haven't explained why I came to the conclusion I have. "That doesn't matter, if you go on, you ruin your point". But if I don't go on I have no point.
I am in no way misogynistic, I have merely explained truth, and if you dissagree with that, give me an example of how I am a misogynist.
The reason why you see it as a joke is because you don't want to hear it, and assuming that you're a woman, that's completely understandable.
Do you think it's just a coinsidence that 99.9% of users on here that seem to think what I say is a joke are women? Funny that, isn't it?
Personally, I have grown to expect women to react the way you have here. Women have this whole "our gender is equal in every way, but don't treat us in every way. Oh we're so hard done to" attitude, that if anyone mentions anything that implies anything different, it's just a joke.
I am doing this for males to hear more than I am for women to hear so that they can understand, not for women. I don't care if women find it a joke, because I find such women as jokes, and I only care about the male's opinions on it because 98% of women cannot think rationally if what is being discussed involves something that is offensive to any group she belongs to (female gender).
A fine example to this is how the majority of my polls on this matter that I have given options such as:
Male - I agree
Male - I dissagee
Female - I agree
Female - I dissagree
The males tend to agree, where as, suprise suprise, the majority of females dissagree.
Don't assume just because the majority of the people that reply to me dissagree with me equals to the majority of people here dissagreeing with me, because there are far more users that don't comment and reply than those that do, and males that answer polls agree with me.
Don't assume that just because the majority of replies to me (not many all in) don't agree with me, because it seems the ones that don't comment agree with me.
Women are offended easily, and when they do, rational thinking is very rare. A fine example would be how I tested the community. I made two stories, both are different scenarios with the same reasoning, but only one mentioned women directly, where as the one that didn't involve any gender and was an everyday activity didn't mention women at all, so the part which would make them offended was gone. Both scenarious were the same situation, same reasioning, same deductive logic. The women that were offended and dissagreed so much with the female ones obviously dissagreed with me, yet a few of those people that were saying I was wrong on the women one agreed with me fully on the other scenario that had the same situation, just without the part that could offend women, and the majority agreed with me on the scenario that didn't involve women as a part of it.
Funny that, isn't it?
So again. When I speak on these subjects, it's for men to hear, women can bitch if they want, they usually can't answer my points anyway.
I clearly stated at the start that the first paragraph is off topic, which implies to just skip to the second paragaraph.
People like to blame the men that run strip clubs for strippers, so I thought I would make a half joke/half truth. A lot of people even on this site don't blame the womenchoosing to be strippers as much as the people employing women to be strippers.
Again, I clearly indicated the first paragraph was off topic.
--
NeuroNeptunian
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
=.=
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ugh. As if an indication to tell you not to read the top part if you want to read the part on topic was enough to make someone that doesn't want to read things off topic to...You know, skip the off topic part.
I clearly stated what was on topic and what wasn't, you decided to read it, that was your doing.
--
NeuroNeptunian
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
=.=
...
FUCKNIAVJDBIUSHBJNFKJS
Now THAT is off topic.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
...I don't see your point here...