It isn't a difficult concept. If people feel guilty for the actions of others, it stands to reason that others will follow suit as the hate spreads. Both sides of the debate will grow to compensate for the other. If the guilt wasn't justified to some extent, it would disappear. I think guilt is a wasted emotion, but some people are so blind and unconscious of their actions, I don't blame them for feeling something. Whether that be hate or guilt, both exist because of the other. To stop the guilt, you have to stop the hate. But I don't see that happening anytime soon.
Stopping hate is just not realistic. People will always hate what they either don't fully understand or that which is totally and completely different from themselves. Not everyone of course, but there will always be people who do that. What you are looking for is tolerance and acceptance. These are nice concepts and in a perfect world they would be the standard.
We live in a world that is far from perfect and in the very near future the world will be plunged into war again, perhaps the greatest war humanity has ever seen. It's completely inevitable.
People should only feel guilty for hating themselves. You can't tell people what they should feel if they aren't responsible for anything they are accused of.
"I think guilt is a wasted emotion, but some people are so blind and unconscious of their actions"
Bullshit. That would be trying to instill guilt in someone's mind. You can't be unaware of your actions, unless you suffer from some kind of psychological disorder.
Your passive aggresive rhetoric doesn't work on me. You are ill prepared.
I'm not a republican. I'm an independent thinker, as edgy and cringy that may sound...
I still uphold ideas that are more conservative/traditional in nature, therefor my affinity to republican candidates.
That being said, there's plenty of reprehensible pieces of shit on the republican side, like Ted Cruz, who tries his hardest to boycot Trump's rallies as of late. As a matter of fact, the entire RepubliCUNT clique is trying to undermine Trump's campaign, aside from Ben Carson, of course, who endorses Trump.
Ben Carson might look like he's just waking up from a nap, but I'm pretty sure he's the most intelligent of them all. Honestly, I really like him.
:^)
My new guy describes himself as a free thinker.
:-)
♡☆♡☆♡☆
Wait, did you just say what people "should" feel, then follow it by telling me I cant say how people "should" feel? As if you are the should police.
Did you link those two thoughts together at all? I never said what people should or should not feel, only that I didn't blame them for having feelings. Whichever feeling they might have. Clearly your emotions are effecting your rational thought.
You don't think people are unconscious? Wow. That is kind of .... unconscious behavior right there. But I knew you were always a little pathological...that was passive aggressive. My previous comment was not. Study it. Learn the difference between the two.
If a certain standard imposed on people is harmful, then yes, they should be at least be informed of the dangers they are exposed to.
"Wait, did you just say what people "should" feel, then follow it by telling me I cant say how people "should" feel? As if you are the should police."
Don't play that game with me. Using false equivalents to deturn the conversation and poiting the hypocritical finger at me won't work.
You are the one who's trying to impose a certain standard. I'm just countering it.
Even if it's a passive way of subversion, it's still meant to impose an idea by force, nonetheless.
"I never said what people should or should not feel, only that I didn't blame them for having feelings."
Reverse psychology 101...
"Clearly your emotions are effecting your rational thought."
You are projecting.
"You don't think people are unconscious?"
As long as we've established that someone is unconscious, they should be automatically absolved of any rationalized guilt. If they feel guilt or remorse, that would mean they are conscious.
Like I said before, you can't be held accountable for something you didn't do, and if you did it, and are unaware of it, that would mean you have mental disorders, and that's an individual issue, not a demographic issue, like you're insinuating.
You're one of those people who entertain the idea that suggests white privilege exists and it's institutionalized. Why don't you just spout it out? Stop beating around the bush and say what you really wanna say.
That wasn't quite what I meant. It isn't Trump's actions specifically, but the fact that his followers are causing violence based on this fear and stupidity that he promotes.
I understand why people follow Trump. He represents a failure in our political system. People want change, that is obvious. But steering it towards violence has rarely worked well for the people, only for those with power.
And who were the ones who actually carried out physical attacks? Trump supporters or Sanders fucking socialist chimps?
Stop trying to find excuses for primitive behavior. You know damn well that if the situation was reversed, every fucking news outlet would cry for war against "racism and fascism".
Leftist drones have shown their true colors once again. This is the type of person that votes for socialism. This is the filth that our country has absorbed throughout the years due to amnesty and unregulated immigration.
So? They aren't immune to racism. I'm not saying it's right, but it should come as no surprise that some people would hate you for the color of your skin.
Self hating white people
← View full post
Pretty sure Trump won't solve any guilt problems. He is only adding to it. And doing a damn good job of it. He sure knows how to tend his flock.
--
Crusades___
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
RoseIsabella
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
How is he adding to the problem? Explain.
--
howaminotmyself
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
It isn't a difficult concept. If people feel guilty for the actions of others, it stands to reason that others will follow suit as the hate spreads. Both sides of the debate will grow to compensate for the other. If the guilt wasn't justified to some extent, it would disappear. I think guilt is a wasted emotion, but some people are so blind and unconscious of their actions, I don't blame them for feeling something. Whether that be hate or guilt, both exist because of the other. To stop the guilt, you have to stop the hate. But I don't see that happening anytime soon.
--
Soapy_Testicles
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
-
Crusades___
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Stopping hate is just not realistic. People will always hate what they either don't fully understand or that which is totally and completely different from themselves. Not everyone of course, but there will always be people who do that. What you are looking for is tolerance and acceptance. These are nice concepts and in a perfect world they would be the standard.
We live in a world that is far from perfect and in the very near future the world will be plunged into war again, perhaps the greatest war humanity has ever seen. It's completely inevitable.
People should only feel guilty for hating themselves. You can't tell people what they should feel if they aren't responsible for anything they are accused of.
"I think guilt is a wasted emotion, but some people are so blind and unconscious of their actions"
Bullshit. That would be trying to instill guilt in someone's mind. You can't be unaware of your actions, unless you suffer from some kind of psychological disorder.
Your passive aggresive rhetoric doesn't work on me. You are ill prepared.
Now fuck off.
--
RoseIsabella
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
howaminotmyself
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Keep it sexy, my Republican friend!
--
Crusades___
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
lol
I'm not a republican. I'm an independent thinker, as edgy and cringy that may sound...
I still uphold ideas that are more conservative/traditional in nature, therefor my affinity to republican candidates.
That being said, there's plenty of reprehensible pieces of shit on the republican side, like Ted Cruz, who tries his hardest to boycot Trump's rallies as of late. As a matter of fact, the entire RepubliCUNT clique is trying to undermine Trump's campaign, aside from Ben Carson, of course, who endorses Trump.
--
RoseIsabella
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Ben Carson might look like he's just waking up from a nap, but I'm pretty sure he's the most intelligent of them all. Honestly, I really like him.
:^)
My new guy describes himself as a free thinker.
:-)
♡☆♡☆♡☆
Wait, did you just say what people "should" feel, then follow it by telling me I cant say how people "should" feel? As if you are the should police.
Did you link those two thoughts together at all? I never said what people should or should not feel, only that I didn't blame them for having feelings. Whichever feeling they might have. Clearly your emotions are effecting your rational thought.
You don't think people are unconscious? Wow. That is kind of .... unconscious behavior right there. But I knew you were always a little pathological...that was passive aggressive. My previous comment was not. Study it. Learn the difference between the two.
--
Crusades___
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If a certain standard imposed on people is harmful, then yes, they should be at least be informed of the dangers they are exposed to.
"Wait, did you just say what people "should" feel, then follow it by telling me I cant say how people "should" feel? As if you are the should police."
Don't play that game with me. Using false equivalents to deturn the conversation and poiting the hypocritical finger at me won't work.
You are the one who's trying to impose a certain standard. I'm just countering it.
Even if it's a passive way of subversion, it's still meant to impose an idea by force, nonetheless.
"I never said what people should or should not feel, only that I didn't blame them for having feelings."
Reverse psychology 101...
"Clearly your emotions are effecting your rational thought."
You are projecting.
"You don't think people are unconscious?"
As long as we've established that someone is unconscious, they should be automatically absolved of any rationalized guilt. If they feel guilt or remorse, that would mean they are conscious.
Like I said before, you can't be held accountable for something you didn't do, and if you did it, and are unaware of it, that would mean you have mental disorders, and that's an individual issue, not a demographic issue, like you're insinuating.
You're one of those people who entertain the idea that suggests white privilege exists and it's institutionalized. Why don't you just spout it out? Stop beating around the bush and say what you really wanna say.
--
howaminotmyself
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Bravo! Spoken like a true unconscious mind.
I am not the one imposing anything on anyone. People are free to feel however they want.
Trump doesn't make me feel guilty for anything, because I have nothing for which to feel guilty!
--
howaminotmyself
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That wasn't quite what I meant. It isn't Trump's actions specifically, but the fact that his followers are causing violence based on this fear and stupidity that he promotes.
I understand why people follow Trump. He represents a failure in our political system. People want change, that is obvious. But steering it towards violence has rarely worked well for the people, only for those with power.
--
Crusades___
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
RoseIsabella
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Name one fucking thing said by Donald Trump that was meant to instill fear or hatred.
--
howaminotmyself
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Right....because telling people to punch someone in the face was meant out of kindness.
--
Crusades___
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
And who were the ones who actually carried out physical attacks? Trump supporters or Sanders fucking socialist chimps?
Stop trying to find excuses for primitive behavior. You know damn well that if the situation was reversed, every fucking news outlet would cry for war against "racism and fascism".
Leftist drones have shown their true colors once again. This is the type of person that votes for socialism. This is the filth that our country has absorbed throughout the years due to amnesty and unregulated immigration.
--
howaminotmyself
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
What are you even talking about?
I see what your saying, but I'll never feel guilty just, because of my light skin like a lot of left wing racists seem to expect.
--
howaminotmyself
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Is this really a common problem?
--
RoseIsabella
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Sadly, some people really enjoy demonizing white Europeans.
--
howaminotmyself
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
So? They aren't immune to racism. I'm not saying it's right, but it should come as no surprise that some people would hate you for the color of your skin.