Valid point, but to define the objective of a firearm as 'to maim and kill' overlooks the sport of recreational shooting. By no means does the 2nd amendment permit recreational shooting, but you should know that some people prefer to shoot inanimate objects and targets. I personally prefer this objective of a firearm, and I feel one should be allowed to pursue this harmless hobby.
Ironically, the second amendment doesn't say anything about shooting. It has to do with arms. It would be quite permissible under U.S. law to prohibit their use while guaranteeing the right of ownership.
Yeah, it's a good point. I am perhaps biased because guns are illegal in my country and we have banned hunting. But recreational shooting seems like it could be harmless if it's practiced responsibly. I'd probably even enjoy it myself.
Second Amendment, meaning of
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Valid point, but to define the objective of a firearm as 'to maim and kill' overlooks the sport of recreational shooting. By no means does the 2nd amendment permit recreational shooting, but you should know that some people prefer to shoot inanimate objects and targets. I personally prefer this objective of a firearm, and I feel one should be allowed to pursue this harmless hobby.
--
[Old Memory]
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
dappled
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Ironically, the second amendment doesn't say anything about shooting. It has to do with arms. It would be quite permissible under U.S. law to prohibit their use while guaranteeing the right of ownership.
Yeah, it's a good point. I am perhaps biased because guns are illegal in my country and we have banned hunting. But recreational shooting seems like it could be harmless if it's practiced responsibly. I'd probably even enjoy it myself.