Scientific arguments against Christian god

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

↑ View this comment's parent

← View full post
Comments ( 3 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • Infinite regression is my point. It's simpler from Occam's razor point of view to say the universe was always there than to postulate a god that was always there created it as a god would be an even more complex construct.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • I think it was always there too. I already know that a God in the sense Christains see it can't be it, too much of it is preposterous, one "man" with such magical powers, Adam and Eve, creating every mountain, lake, ocean, animal in one week? Like I said before, a red horned guy with a pitchfork?
      However, there are still incredible levels of mysteries unanswered, and even the most intelligent people ever have only come up with theories including Einstein, Stephen Hawking, Darwin, etc. Nobody knows the answers 100%. I sure don't know. I just believe that the Christain answers seem too ridiculous. And I don't believe in the big bang, something can not come from nothing, it's impossible. But, if something was here forever, how could that be? There would still have to be something before it. Saying that there was nothing makes no sense. How did everything get here to begin with? I dont know. I don't really know that if there is anything actually that is truely impossible. There's really not one answer to any of these beliefs that fits within the realm of "normal" possiblility. They are all huge mysteries nobody really is ever going to know for sure.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • A large answer is time. Is it just a measurement of the occurring of two events? The idea where god created everything in 7 days is interpreted differently. Some say it is literal, and others, such as myself, say that a day was not just strictly 24 hours, because how could there be a day if no sun or earth was yet created.

        Comment Hidden ( show )