Like I said female representation has enhanced in the past 20 years more than ever, in the 50s majority were house wives, by 80s working but vast majority were bossed around and did what men told them to do , by 2020 women have taken over men in work force participation, and women are the bosses so they are more outgoing and have more voices and the no of women victims is only increasing (similarly incidents of women police brutality on men and women are increasing too). Also I have been here 8 years, I know you are trying to drag attention away from the main topic of racism and trying to cause a gender divides strategy by most white supremacist. The focus is racism not gender. Either stick on topic or whatever, I have better things to do.
I've been around a few years too, from what I remember he gets super friendly around girls and he said he meets all the standards for being trans except for actually identifying that way; I've seen him go deep into a comment thread that ended with each of them agreeing they explained their ideas without trying to change anyone's mind.
That's disappointing. I thought you'd be able to keep up with the discussion but evidently your unwillingness to answer the question proves otherwise. At first I gave the benefit of the doubt and explained that you didn't answer and then directly asked you why more white men are killed by cops than black women and you devolve into the topic of women in the workforce. That's a shame.
And there it is. When you can't keep up with a discussion just default to the "You're a white supremacist line", yes, yes, I know, you didn't call me one you just compared me to one through strategy so you could indirectly call me one without being held to account for it. I know the tricks.
The reason why I bring sex into the subject is to determine if you're genuine or not, and you certainly are not. It's a nice little trick to find out if someone genuinely has an issue with discrimination or if it's all just one big morality catwalk. I do this by putting an undeniable assertion, stated or implied, based on the standards you use to argue black people are discriminated against and review your reaction. The fact that you are trying your hardest to pivot away from stating men are systemically discriminated against by law enforcement even though that's a conclusion made by your formula to claim black people are discriminated against shows that this is less about discrimination and more about what group is being discriminated against, and if your ability to accept discrimination changes depending on what group it is which fits your standards then you've already demonstrated that you yourself don't buy into your own formula to determine when discrimination is happening.
So yes, you have better things to do than not being able to follow a discussion, so you best go do them.
Racists using covid as an excuse for us not to protest. BLM > some virus
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Like I said female representation has enhanced in the past 20 years more than ever, in the 50s majority were house wives, by 80s working but vast majority were bossed around and did what men told them to do , by 2020 women have taken over men in work force participation, and women are the bosses so they are more outgoing and have more voices and the no of women victims is only increasing (similarly incidents of women police brutality on men and women are increasing too). Also I have been here 8 years, I know you are trying to drag attention away from the main topic of racism and trying to cause a gender divides strategy by most white supremacist. The focus is racism not gender. Either stick on topic or whatever, I have better things to do.
--
[Old Memory]
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
[Old Memory]
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I've been around a few years too, from what I remember he gets super friendly around girls and he said he meets all the standards for being trans except for actually identifying that way; I've seen him go deep into a comment thread that ended with each of them agreeing they explained their ideas without trying to change anyone's mind.
Why do you think he's a bad person?
That's disappointing. I thought you'd be able to keep up with the discussion but evidently your unwillingness to answer the question proves otherwise. At first I gave the benefit of the doubt and explained that you didn't answer and then directly asked you why more white men are killed by cops than black women and you devolve into the topic of women in the workforce. That's a shame.
And there it is. When you can't keep up with a discussion just default to the "You're a white supremacist line", yes, yes, I know, you didn't call me one you just compared me to one through strategy so you could indirectly call me one without being held to account for it. I know the tricks.
The reason why I bring sex into the subject is to determine if you're genuine or not, and you certainly are not. It's a nice little trick to find out if someone genuinely has an issue with discrimination or if it's all just one big morality catwalk. I do this by putting an undeniable assertion, stated or implied, based on the standards you use to argue black people are discriminated against and review your reaction. The fact that you are trying your hardest to pivot away from stating men are systemically discriminated against by law enforcement even though that's a conclusion made by your formula to claim black people are discriminated against shows that this is less about discrimination and more about what group is being discriminated against, and if your ability to accept discrimination changes depending on what group it is which fits your standards then you've already demonstrated that you yourself don't buy into your own formula to determine when discrimination is happening.
So yes, you have better things to do than not being able to follow a discussion, so you best go do them.