I specifically said that it would only be for the purchase of products after a certain date and to make illegal the resale of ones that are circulating.
Did you even read my post?
Secondly, I also said twice now that it wasn't the pinpoint of my argument. I don't care about the 6 shot thing specifically. I don't know enough about guns to make that call. I don't know what you're trying to prove.
I was mainly opposing the logic she was using to make her argument.
If I was trying to debate gun mechanics with you, I'm sure you'd win over me in that debate. But I am talking about the logic behind regulations and why people shouldn't just blow off the proposal of a regulation when it comes to firearms.
"But I am talking about the logic behind regulations and why people shouldn't just blow off the proposal of a regulation when it comes to firearms."
Ah yes, the good ol' logic coming from people who don't know anything about guns.
It would be illogical to NOT blow you off, moron. You don't know ANYTHING about guns, current gun laws, gun owners or anything. Your ingenius solution is to limit round capacity yet you don't even know how this works as policy, mechanically and practically.
Dude... you need to seriously re-read what I wrote. I specifically said my argument did not have to do with round capacity. I don't care about the six shot thing in particular. Fair enough? Just to be clear, I didn't create this post. I am not the OP. I didn't come up with the six shot thing.
This is typical. All I hear from people who try to bash me in gun arguments is "Moron, idiot, ignorant, don't know what you're talking about.. etc" But you only say those things because there aren't too many good arguments against what I am saying. I think my approach is pretty reasonable, which is why there isn't much you can say about it. It's really pretty neutral.
You try to bash my argument based on my qualifications rather than the substance.
I've read and reread your responses and I can't find the substance. Obviously with 20k laws and there are still tragic shootings laws aren't the answer.
And just to be clear I'm far from a "gun nut". Not a NRA member. I enjoy target shooting and hunting with my friends. I also enjoy knowing I won't be a victim. I break no gun laws and am not a danger to any one that isn't trying to hurt me. More laws like you suggest would only serve to make me a law breaker.
I give up trying to fight you guys on this. I've had this discussion with people who are into guns before and it always is a never ending cycle.
I obviously have a very different point of view on this than you guys do.
You can't find the substance in my argument because you don't want to view it as substance. You just see it as garbage, ignorant bantering. But then again, like I said, I think I was pretty reasonable with what I was saying and you can either choose to kinda see my point, or you can turn the other way.
Questions on gun control
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I specifically said that it would only be for the purchase of products after a certain date and to make illegal the resale of ones that are circulating.
Did you even read my post?
Secondly, I also said twice now that it wasn't the pinpoint of my argument. I don't care about the 6 shot thing specifically. I don't know enough about guns to make that call. I don't know what you're trying to prove.
I was mainly opposing the logic she was using to make her argument.
If I was trying to debate gun mechanics with you, I'm sure you'd win over me in that debate. But I am talking about the logic behind regulations and why people shouldn't just blow off the proposal of a regulation when it comes to firearms.
--
wigz
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
"But I am talking about the logic behind regulations and why people shouldn't just blow off the proposal of a regulation when it comes to firearms."
Ah yes, the good ol' logic coming from people who don't know anything about guns.
It would be illogical to NOT blow you off, moron. You don't know ANYTHING about guns, current gun laws, gun owners or anything. Your ingenius solution is to limit round capacity yet you don't even know how this works as policy, mechanically and practically.
The voice of reason and logic right here....
--
Cocomilktitties
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Dude... you need to seriously re-read what I wrote. I specifically said my argument did not have to do with round capacity. I don't care about the six shot thing in particular. Fair enough? Just to be clear, I didn't create this post. I am not the OP. I didn't come up with the six shot thing.
This is typical. All I hear from people who try to bash me in gun arguments is "Moron, idiot, ignorant, don't know what you're talking about.. etc" But you only say those things because there aren't too many good arguments against what I am saying. I think my approach is pretty reasonable, which is why there isn't much you can say about it. It's really pretty neutral.
You try to bash my argument based on my qualifications rather than the substance.
--
mysistersshadow
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I've read and reread your responses and I can't find the substance. Obviously with 20k laws and there are still tragic shootings laws aren't the answer.
And just to be clear I'm far from a "gun nut". Not a NRA member. I enjoy target shooting and hunting with my friends. I also enjoy knowing I won't be a victim. I break no gun laws and am not a danger to any one that isn't trying to hurt me. More laws like you suggest would only serve to make me a law breaker.
--
Cocomilktitties
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I give up trying to fight you guys on this. I've had this discussion with people who are into guns before and it always is a never ending cycle.
I obviously have a very different point of view on this than you guys do.
You can't find the substance in my argument because you don't want to view it as substance. You just see it as garbage, ignorant bantering. But then again, like I said, I think I was pretty reasonable with what I was saying and you can either choose to kinda see my point, or you can turn the other way.