What Tommythecaty seems to referring to is the one-electron universe postulate, which I explained in greater depth in a reply to them. See that reply for more information.
They might also be suggesting that what we perceive as two quantumly entangled particles is in fact one particle in a quantum superposition, that is, existing in two places simultaneously.
Counterintuitively, this is very possible in the quantum realm, but no, it's a separate phenomenon from quantum entanglement.
Yes but Vanta, my man, why fight the central limit theorem of statistics? The second law of thermodynamics is a one directional phenomenon. Schrödinger's cat would never be entangled with another kitty, so to speak, on a relative Lagragian point inside CERN's doughnut.
Isn't string theory our best hope for the graceful unification we are looking for here? Hoping you will reply, because your VIP presence is an honor for our humble website of high aptitude fuck ups (myself included).
What, so like we have double slit experiment which shows that the particle will behave, based on how it's observed and what the observer thinks as it's starting seem, as both a particle and a wave
But there's also the possibility that there can be two physically separate parts based on the same(?) underlying principle?
Quantum Entanglement Time Travel Hypothesis
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
What Tommythecaty seems to referring to is the one-electron universe postulate, which I explained in greater depth in a reply to them. See that reply for more information.
They might also be suggesting that what we perceive as two quantumly entangled particles is in fact one particle in a quantum superposition, that is, existing in two places simultaneously.
Counterintuitively, this is very possible in the quantum realm, but no, it's a separate phenomenon from quantum entanglement.
--
Bazinga
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
[Old Memory]
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes but Vanta, my man, why fight the central limit theorem of statistics? The second law of thermodynamics is a one directional phenomenon. Schrödinger's cat would never be entangled with another kitty, so to speak, on a relative Lagragian point inside CERN's doughnut.
Isn't string theory our best hope for the graceful unification we are looking for here? Hoping you will reply, because your VIP presence is an honor for our humble website of high aptitude fuck ups (myself included).
--
Vanta_White
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Of course. I'm swamped with sudden tasks required of me at the moment but I'll definitely reply. I'm here to stay. I'm fond of you as well by the way.
--
Bazinga
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Please be assured that the feeling is mutual.
--
[Old Memory]
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Who is he?
--
Bazinga
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
My new friend.
What, so like we have double slit experiment which shows that the particle will behave, based on how it's observed and what the observer thinks as it's starting seem, as both a particle and a wave
But there's also the possibility that there can be two physically separate parts based on the same(?) underlying principle?