Quantum Entanglement Time Travel Hypothesis

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

↑ View this comment's parent

← View full post
Comments ( 28 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • [Old Memory]
    3 years ago | pl

    Are you referencing the big bang? Since all of existence was once coalesced into one lump of energy, and everything that exists now is an extension of that once unified energy, everything is connected?

    I feel like that has a name, but I forget

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    Report
    0
    0
      -
    • Vanta_White
      3 years ago | pl

      What Tommythecaty seems to referring to is the one-electron universe postulate, which I explained in greater depth in a reply to them. See that reply for more information.

      They might also be suggesting that what we perceive as two quantumly entangled particles is in fact one particle in a quantum superposition, that is, existing in two places simultaneously.

      Counterintuitively, this is very possible in the quantum realm, but no, it's a separate phenomenon from quantum entanglement.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      Report
      0
      0
        -
      • Bazinga
        3 years ago | pl

        Yes but Vanta, my man, why fight the central limit theorem of statistics? The second law of thermodynamics is a one directional phenomenon. Schrödinger's cat would never be entangled with another kitty, so to speak, on a relative Lagragian point inside CERN's doughnut.

        Isn't string theory our best hope for the graceful unification we are looking for here? Hoping you will reply, because your VIP presence is an honor for our humble website of high aptitude fuck ups (myself included).

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        Report
        0
        0
          -
        • Vanta_White
          3 years ago | pl

          Of course. I'm swamped with sudden tasks required of me at the moment but I'll definitely reply. I'm here to stay. I'm fond of you as well by the way.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          Report
          0
          0
      • [Old Memory]
        3 years ago | pl

        What, so like we have double slit experiment which shows that the particle will behave, based on how it's observed and what the observer thinks as it's starting seem, as both a particle and a wave

        But there's also the possibility that there can be two physically separate parts based on the same(?) underlying principle?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        Report
        0
        0
    • Tommythecaty
      3 years ago | pl

      Yeah I heard some theory that there’s only one and it’s our observation that’s wrong. Goes over my head

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      Report
      0
      0
        -
      • Bazinga
        3 years ago | pl

        Hey Doc, instead of entangling your brain, do a quick check on Wikipedia of the Pauli Exclusion principle. It frames the problem nicely before you would decide to enter the cathedral of mathematical zealotry espoused by theoretical physicists. Anyway, medical vigilance is what Tasmania is banking on. You da man.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        Report
        0
        0
          -
        • Tommythecaty
          3 years ago | pl

          pfffft Schrödinger was a kook, Tommy’s cat is where it’s at.

          There’s only one and that’s why the thing reacts regardless of distance, because it’s the same one. Slit experiment was right but observed all wrong and there ain’t no spooky action like caty action.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          Report
          0
          0
      • [Old Memory]
        3 years ago | pl

        Oh, like the ratio of matter to anti matter? My physics teacher explained -1, 0, and 1

        What about the observation? Like it'll indicate as one thing but function as another?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        Report
        0
        0