Yes, imagine that but one of them moving so fast it could be accelerated into the future, then teleported back to the present
As it stands, space and time seem to be linked, and the atomic clock experiment and the relativity paradox shows that there's a warp in both space and time when you accelerate near light speed.
So the time and space of one of the two quantum entangled particles is warped, and it is proven as you said that distance, or space, won't negate the influence they have on each other or their teleporting abilities
So if space doesn't matter, what about time?
This post is meant to be a thought experiment, discussed by anyone
They could be, the hydrogen collider could be repurposed to get one of those entangled particles to travel fast enough
Cern does scare me a little bit though, part of me wonders if some of this stuff would be like pulling out essential threads of clothing but we were able to split an atom successfully so who knows
We've /already/ pulled this off actually (the entanglement across time aspect anyway), as I said in my longer comment, but we did so in a way that is a bit more complicated to explain albeit simpler to pull off. I can elaborate if you want but the point is that it can definitely be done as you rightly expected given the nature of spacetime.
The method used can even offer the impression that from our reference point the two particles never even initially interacted (which is of course crucial to achieving entanglement). Some argue that this possibility within the realm of temporal nonlocality is even more spooky than that which Einstein infamously described as "spooky action at a distance" regarding spatial nonlocality, but it's arguably more of an illusion in a sense as, as you demonstrably already know, all particles have their own "historians" and no reference point is more valid than another.
Good job on suspecting that this is possible. That said, this doesn't provide a mechanism to then send one particle back in time any more than purely spatial entanglement allows for one particle to teleport across space.
Whether or not entanglement can be used to send information back in time or across the universe faster than light, however, is arguably somewhat still open to debate. That's what my longer comment focused on.
If we can test this stuff at any distance on Earth, my first thought would be that there is no limit. But light seems slow if you scale up enough, so it's possible the limits are beyond our immediate field of awareness. Do they ever talk about needing a cognitive observer, or is it more like the tree will make the noise regardless?
Theyre doing creepy stuff at cern did you ever see the human sacrifice video? They tried pulling it off the internet CERN's defense was "its just a prank bro". Weird stuff
I know lmao. You seem like a smart guy what do you make of all that stuff? Idk much about it but the whole CERN situation seems weird. Idk wtf they're trying to do there and why the have the 666 and all the satanic statues
Quantum Entanglement Time Travel Hypothesis
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Yes, imagine that but one of them moving so fast it could be accelerated into the future, then teleported back to the present
As it stands, space and time seem to be linked, and the atomic clock experiment and the relativity paradox shows that there's a warp in both space and time when you accelerate near light speed.
So the time and space of one of the two quantum entangled particles is warped, and it is proven as you said that distance, or space, won't negate the influence they have on each other or their teleporting abilities
So if space doesn't matter, what about time?
This post is meant to be a thought experiment, discussed by anyone
--
FromTheSouthWeirdMan
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That sounds pretty cool. Theyre probably already working on that at cern.
--
[Old Memory]
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
They could be, the hydrogen collider could be repurposed to get one of those entangled particles to travel fast enough
Cern does scare me a little bit though, part of me wonders if some of this stuff would be like pulling out essential threads of clothing but we were able to split an atom successfully so who knows
--
Vanta_White
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
FromTheSouthWeirdMan
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
We've /already/ pulled this off actually (the entanglement across time aspect anyway), as I said in my longer comment, but we did so in a way that is a bit more complicated to explain albeit simpler to pull off. I can elaborate if you want but the point is that it can definitely be done as you rightly expected given the nature of spacetime.
The method used can even offer the impression that from our reference point the two particles never even initially interacted (which is of course crucial to achieving entanglement). Some argue that this possibility within the realm of temporal nonlocality is even more spooky than that which Einstein infamously described as "spooky action at a distance" regarding spatial nonlocality, but it's arguably more of an illusion in a sense as, as you demonstrably already know, all particles have their own "historians" and no reference point is more valid than another.
Good job on suspecting that this is possible. That said, this doesn't provide a mechanism to then send one particle back in time any more than purely spatial entanglement allows for one particle to teleport across space.
Whether or not entanglement can be used to send information back in time or across the universe faster than light, however, is arguably somewhat still open to debate. That's what my longer comment focused on.
--
[Old Memory]
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Tell me about it
If we can test this stuff at any distance on Earth, my first thought would be that there is no limit. But light seems slow if you scale up enough, so it's possible the limits are beyond our immediate field of awareness. Do they ever talk about needing a cognitive observer, or is it more like the tree will make the noise regardless?
Theyre doing creepy stuff at cern did you ever see the human sacrifice video? They tried pulling it off the internet CERN's defense was "its just a prank bro". Weird stuff
https://youtu.be/Yo5AOe_yS9Y
--
[Old Memory]
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
It doesn't help that their logo is 666
--
FromTheSouthWeirdMan
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I know lmao. You seem like a smart guy what do you make of all that stuff? Idk much about it but the whole CERN situation seems weird. Idk wtf they're trying to do there and why the have the 666 and all the satanic statues
--
Bazinga
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Hahaha. Chill, my dude, those geeks at CERN are looking for the God particle, aka a Higgs boson. I think they finally found one.