Maybe you should do some research before you start blabbing things that aren't true...but I guess that's a requirement for you Christians.
The judge dismissed the case of McDonald's and obesity because "The complaint fails to allege the McDonald's products consumed by the plaintiffs were dangerous in any way other than that which was open and obvious to a reasonable consumer"
The same thing can be applied to your story. It's quite obvious the consequences of staying on here too long. Obviously, most of us are responsible enough to know when enough is enough. This site is used as an escape for some (at least for me and I know I can't be the only one). Your argument for the time limit is weak. Neglect bfs and gfs, consume too much coffee, lose scholarships? I don't know about you but I know when I can fuck around on here and when I need to get shit done. You pay attention to yours and I'll make sure I get my stuff done. Deal? Take your ridiculous falsified rant elsewhere.
That's because he had to eat several samples a day. He was forced which is why he won. Anyways, no CONSUMER could win a suit about that. Get your story straight ace.
Put a Limit On How Long People Can Be On?
← View full post
That's like blaming McDonald's for making you fat. It's not like you're forced to stay on here or buy a big mac. Practice some self control.
--
nobleserpent
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-3
-3
McDonald's was sued over their Products and how obese it made some people.
They lost and were forced to pay a heavy price.
Yes, you read that right TheManagement.
You have to limit People in order to keep their safety from danger.
I hope The Management is listening...for your sake.
--
lc1988
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
riptide31
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
LOL I'm not one of the lazy asses that sued. I've managed to keep my scholarship and studies in tact while on this site.
Maybe you should do some research before you start blabbing things that aren't true...but I guess that's a requirement for you Christians.
The judge dismissed the case of McDonald's and obesity because "The complaint fails to allege the McDonald's products consumed by the plaintiffs were dangerous in any way other than that which was open and obvious to a reasonable consumer"
The same thing can be applied to your story. It's quite obvious the consequences of staying on here too long. Obviously, most of us are responsible enough to know when enough is enough. This site is used as an escape for some (at least for me and I know I can't be the only one). Your argument for the time limit is weak. Neglect bfs and gfs, consume too much coffee, lose scholarships? I don't know about you but I know when I can fuck around on here and when I need to get shit done. You pay attention to yours and I'll make sure I get my stuff done. Deal? Take your ridiculous falsified rant elsewhere.
--
nobleserpent
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
A Brazilian man sued McDonald's over his Obesity and he won. Yes you read that right.
The Company was forced to pay the man $17,500 for his poor decisions.
Do you know what $17,500 looks like, TheManagement? I do.
It looks like obsessed Posters without the 1 Hr Time Limit.
--
lc1988
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
That's because he had to eat several samples a day. He was forced which is why he won. Anyways, no CONSUMER could win a suit about that. Get your story straight ace.
--
nobleserpent
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
He wasn't required to eat anything, unfortunately. He felt compelled.
A consumer consumes no? Didn't he consume, thus making him a Consumer?
--
lc1988
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It was part of his job to sample. Interpret it how you want it. I can't believe how off topic this went lol. =)