Peace or violence

6 Comments

which is the more effect way to handle confrontations peacefully or violently?

Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 6 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • thegypsysailor
    7 years ago | pl

    It is the situation that dictates the action (or reaction) one takes, not one's choice or personal beliefs.
    A non-violent person should be able to seriously kick ass when they encounter a situation where they find what's going on more strongly unacceptable than their belief in non-violence.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    Report
    3
    3
      -
    • AbnormallyAwesome
      7 years ago | pl

      Yes, you have a point.
      ideologically I'd never hurt or kill someone. But I can still imagine some scenarios in which I'd be capable of doing so. It wouldn't make it right and I'd regret it forever, but I'm only human.
      That's actually why I didn't join the military. Not because I couldn't shoot someone who would kill me, but because I probably would.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      Report
      1
      1
  • unknownteen2503
    7 years ago | pl

    I said violence, more interesting

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    Report
    1
    1
  • AbnormallyAwesome
    7 years ago | pl

    Well, I'm a pacifist, so I'd always go with peacefully. I don't know if it's the most effective way, but I'm pretty sure it's the right one.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    Report
    1
    1
  • wistfulmaiden
    7 years ago | pl

    Depends. I generally walk away

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    Report
    0
    0
  • flyingnostalgia
    7 years ago | pl

    Peach

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    Report
    0
    0