I see nothing wrong with humans of all ages finding attraction to beauty in other humans. I see something SERIOUSLY wrong to reacting to that beauty in a sexual manner if the object of the attraction is to a child. And by "child" I refer to the legal definition of a child.
Your entire story seeks to legitimize sexual feelings for minors; it's not about the mere appreciation of the artistic beauty of the human form. This is all about you gratifying your raw sexual needs, however delicately you may express your intentions. When you state: "i do think its possible for a older person (21-35) to fall in love with a young (12-17) year old and i think its absurd to make it completely illegal", exactly how is it that you propose that society react to such relationships? So when a 35-year-old man "falls in love with" a 12-year-old girl, for example, gets her pregnant and moves on for the next 12 year old girl, in what manner are we elevated as a society?
In such situations, we're almost always talking about an older man seeking to legitimize a relationship with a much younger, immature girl and the man often as not is not so much "in love" as he is "in lust." Please peddle this nonsense elsewhere, or at least at a site where there are less intelligent women present. Have a look at the movie "Hard Candy", my friend. Your nymphs have grown up.
Ok i see your point and i respect it quit a bit
i do admit to being lustfully attracted to younger girls then i and girls with nymph like qualifications and maybe your right it is more of a lust thing! thats a great explanation.
like i said though i have no intention on actually experessing my lust to any girl younger then 16.
i can find beauty in a 14 year old just as i can find beauty in a 27 year old but it doesn't mean i'm going to act on them when i see something i like about either one.
Nymphetism
← View full post
I see nothing wrong with humans of all ages finding attraction to beauty in other humans. I see something SERIOUSLY wrong to reacting to that beauty in a sexual manner if the object of the attraction is to a child. And by "child" I refer to the legal definition of a child.
Your entire story seeks to legitimize sexual feelings for minors; it's not about the mere appreciation of the artistic beauty of the human form. This is all about you gratifying your raw sexual needs, however delicately you may express your intentions. When you state: "i do think its possible for a older person (21-35) to fall in love with a young (12-17) year old and i think its absurd to make it completely illegal", exactly how is it that you propose that society react to such relationships? So when a 35-year-old man "falls in love with" a 12-year-old girl, for example, gets her pregnant and moves on for the next 12 year old girl, in what manner are we elevated as a society?
In such situations, we're almost always talking about an older man seeking to legitimize a relationship with a much younger, immature girl and the man often as not is not so much "in love" as he is "in lust." Please peddle this nonsense elsewhere, or at least at a site where there are less intelligent women present. Have a look at the movie "Hard Candy", my friend. Your nymphs have grown up.
--
[Old Memory]
15 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Hateisthelaw
15 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I agree with you, yet there should be some boundries...
--
Hateisthelaw
15 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
well, good glad you agreed and yes there should be some boundaries.
Ok i see your point and i respect it quit a bit
i do admit to being lustfully attracted to younger girls then i and girls with nymph like qualifications and maybe your right it is more of a lust thing! thats a great explanation.
like i said though i have no intention on actually experessing my lust to any girl younger then 16.
i can find beauty in a 14 year old just as i can find beauty in a 27 year old but it doesn't mean i'm going to act on them when i see something i like about either one.