I suspect you are referring to extremes and "positive discrimination" and so on no? Because regarding old-fashioned men vs women, you have to be honest and admit that in a lot of fields they actually kick our asses. It all depends on the job. I'd prefer a male accountant who has a higher chance of being a complete freak for numbers but a female doctor who perhaps might be more open to questioning her assumptions.
Usually women tend to be better at teaching languages (guessing because they might be more in tune with family concepts dunno) while -just my own experience- math is best taught with ferociousness more likely to be found (and accepted) in male teachers. Those already sharpening axes to accuse me of stereotyping: I base this on own experience.
These are generalizations and the differences might be small or even reversed in the past or future.
That being said, everybody should be allowed to choose their path, but should be subject to the same evaluation as everybody (and not based on gender per se, but on competence and value)
Overdose of info streamed and I admit jumping halfway from the initial post (the bit where you start a list of insults) to the comments, but only now noticed I applied the "relativism" by Killsjs onto the initial post even thought it lacked it completely.
I hope you don't actually mean this? I agree with Hillary being evil, I don't like positive discrimination, nor enforcing quota and so on. Pro tough approach cime. Suspet we'd agree on many things but WTF?
"women are supposed to need men to take care of them and in return women have to make men happy" that's bullshit and I hate to say it, but it's more the other way around even though it never looks like that. Honestly.
Nothing makes a woman more unattractive than being liberal
← View full post
I suspect you are referring to extremes and "positive discrimination" and so on no? Because regarding old-fashioned men vs women, you have to be honest and admit that in a lot of fields they actually kick our asses. It all depends on the job. I'd prefer a male accountant who has a higher chance of being a complete freak for numbers but a female doctor who perhaps might be more open to questioning her assumptions.
Usually women tend to be better at teaching languages (guessing because they might be more in tune with family concepts dunno) while -just my own experience- math is best taught with ferociousness more likely to be found (and accepted) in male teachers. Those already sharpening axes to accuse me of stereotyping: I base this on own experience.
These are generalizations and the differences might be small or even reversed in the past or future.
That being said, everybody should be allowed to choose their path, but should be subject to the same evaluation as everybody (and not based on gender per se, but on competence and value)
--
DerHaifisch
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Overdose of info streamed and I admit jumping halfway from the initial post (the bit where you start a list of insults) to the comments, but only now noticed I applied the "relativism" by Killsjs onto the initial post even thought it lacked it completely.
I hope you don't actually mean this? I agree with Hillary being evil, I don't like positive discrimination, nor enforcing quota and so on. Pro tough approach cime. Suspet we'd agree on many things but WTF?
"women are supposed to need men to take care of them and in return women have to make men happy" that's bullshit and I hate to say it, but it's more the other way around even though it never looks like that. Honestly.