What people dont take in is that there are new species being discoverd just about every day. Letting one or two die off isnt going to be the end of the world... depending. But if humans are the cause for a species dieing then it's our responsability to save it. I agree though, if a species dies off because of its own inability to servive. Unless we can gain something from it, let it die. Although, humans have the ability to do what ever we want. Includeing the delay of an entire species exstinction. Because we can, we do. We usely dont though unless its to our benifit. If we liked eating tigers, there would be an abundance of them. If we used pandas instead of horeses, not only would it be fun but there would be many, many pandas and panda raceing bookies. Its debateable if you could breed pands in such a way. But if we can do it to dogs, cats, horses, cows, pritty much everything... pidgions. We can do it to pandas. People are against this though. Call it un-natural. Granted it's un-natural, but so is chocolate. Yes, thats right. Chocolate makes their argument invalid! Though the impact it would have on certain species, the world... Farming has proven to leave a carbon footprint, quite contributional to the speed up of global warming. Natural it may be, we can't denie that our industrial and agricultrul (still half asleep) ways, have sped up the process of... global repositioning... is think. That or the sea raises a bit, volcanos create new land and world war breaks out to own the new land. No actual repositioning of current land. Lands will sink though, kinda like the land from england to france... I think it is. Could be wrong. Either way, we do "it", because we can. Normal... and gave me something to do for the past 10-20 minutes.
Natural Selection
← View full post
What people dont take in is that there are new species being discoverd just about every day. Letting one or two die off isnt going to be the end of the world... depending. But if humans are the cause for a species dieing then it's our responsability to save it. I agree though, if a species dies off because of its own inability to servive. Unless we can gain something from it, let it die. Although, humans have the ability to do what ever we want. Includeing the delay of an entire species exstinction. Because we can, we do. We usely dont though unless its to our benifit. If we liked eating tigers, there would be an abundance of them. If we used pandas instead of horeses, not only would it be fun but there would be many, many pandas and panda raceing bookies. Its debateable if you could breed pands in such a way. But if we can do it to dogs, cats, horses, cows, pritty much everything... pidgions. We can do it to pandas. People are against this though. Call it un-natural. Granted it's un-natural, but so is chocolate. Yes, thats right. Chocolate makes their argument invalid! Though the impact it would have on certain species, the world... Farming has proven to leave a carbon footprint, quite contributional to the speed up of global warming. Natural it may be, we can't denie that our industrial and agricultrul (still half asleep) ways, have sped up the process of... global repositioning... is think. That or the sea raises a bit, volcanos create new land and world war breaks out to own the new land. No actual repositioning of current land. Lands will sink though, kinda like the land from england to france... I think it is. Could be wrong. Either way, we do "it", because we can. Normal... and gave me something to do for the past 10-20 minutes.