Natural selection

Of course species going extinct is a bad thing, you god damn retard. It's the massive revolution of humans that causes it, not natural selection. Misleading title.

If extinction of a species is our fault, then shame on humans. Shame on humans for killing tigers because they may have special powers to heal. And any other animal that we do that to.

Global warming is natural. When I was in Alaska, I saw where there was atleast 3 different times when glaciers were at this spot. You could see the carved out earth from each glacier period. We didn't cause the first glacier melt. We weren't around then.

Oh and it's normal because some people turn their backs on things like preventing air pollution in other countries.

As long as they think "at least it's not affecting me", they'll never try to consider helping out.

Just think that some of the animals/plants that go extinct might disrupt the food chain. Then other animals will die off, then later humans would become endangered.
Besides evolution takes time so it's not like we'll suck on the air for food when we lose edible plants or animals.

Other than that, I don't think you have to worry right now because everythings not going to disappear in a couple of years.

What people dont take in is that there are new species being discoverd just about every day. Letting one or two die off isnt going to be the end of the world... depending. But if humans are the cause for a species dieing then it's our responsability to save it. I agree though, if a species dies off because of its own inability to servive. Unless we can gain something from it, let it die. Although, humans have the ability to do what ever we want. Includeing the delay of an entire species exstinction. Because we can, we do. We usely dont though unless its to our benifit. If we liked eating tigers, there would be an abundance of them. If we used pandas instead of horeses, not only would it be fun but there would be many, many pandas and panda raceing bookies. Its debateable if you could breed pands in such a way. But if we can do it to dogs, cats, horses, cows, pritty much everything... pidgions. We can do it to pandas. People are against this though. Call it un-natural. Granted it's un-natural, but so is chocolate. Yes, thats right. Chocolate makes their argument invalid! Though the impact it would have on certain species, the world... Farming has proven to leave a carbon footprint, quite contributional to the speed up of global warming. Natural it may be, we can't denie that our industrial and agricultrul (still half asleep) ways, have sped up the process of... global repositioning... is think. That or the sea raises a bit, volcanos create new land and world war breaks out to own the new land. No actual repositioning of current land. Lands will sink though, kinda like the land from england to france... I think it is. Could be wrong. Either way, we do "it", because we can. Normal... and gave me something to do for the past 10-20 minutes.