There is a difference between stupid people and stupid deeds. To say that someone is stupid just because they say or do something stupid in your eyes does not mean that this person is stupid in general. You said before that it was stupid for me to doubt that OP's thought world is disturbing, acceptable even if I disagree, now you think I'm stupid because of the few things you read from me on here? lmao You can't know that, according to that you are vain. Because you judge people without knowing them, and the way you do it, you put yourself above them, consciously or subconsciously, I don't care, and you obviously don't care because, in that sense, one or two sentences are enough for you to solidify your opinion of the person. Just because stupid people do stupid things doesn't mean that all people who sometimes do stupid things are stupid too. Stupidity is highly situational, only if you really don't understand anything about the world for the majority of your entire life are you really stupid.
There are legitimate people who have no idea that child abuse exists. It is actually hardly possible any more, because we are all confronted with such topics on the internet, radio or in newspapers and stories told by others, but there are definitely people who can live without all that. These people live in a bubble, but that doesn't make them stupid. There is a big difference between stupidity and ignorance.
I definitely couldn't read yesterday, you cleverly realised. Well done! Do you want a medal now? How could I? Have you ever been intoxicated?
Lmao, yeah I don't think i'm above anyone. If calling someone stupid means i'm vain, regardless if I know someone or not, I guess a lot of the users on here are vain. I will admit that you did make a good point when you said, and I quote:"There is a difference between stupid people and stupid deeds. To say that someone is stupid just because they say or do something stupid in your eyes does not mean that this person is stupid in general. You said before that it was stupid for me to doubt that OP's thought world is disturbing, acceptable even if I disagree, now you think I'm stupid because of the few things you read from me on here?". So I will correct myself, but don't get too proud. What you SAID was stupid. Sound better?
"I definitely couldn't read yesterday, you cleverly realised. Well done! Do you want a medal now? How could I? Have you ever been intoxicated?".
To answer your question, no. And also, how am I supposed to know you were a little drunk bastard yesterday? Lmfao. Do YOU want a medal?
No, thank you, sir. That would be a waste of space. Already have enough trophies in my cupboard. And, to answer your question: not at all, that's why I noted that. One should not take everything a drunken "bastard" says deadly seriously. Sooner or later it will only lead to conflict.
My sex addiction's getting worse
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
There is a difference between stupid people and stupid deeds. To say that someone is stupid just because they say or do something stupid in your eyes does not mean that this person is stupid in general. You said before that it was stupid for me to doubt that OP's thought world is disturbing, acceptable even if I disagree, now you think I'm stupid because of the few things you read from me on here? lmao You can't know that, according to that you are vain. Because you judge people without knowing them, and the way you do it, you put yourself above them, consciously or subconsciously, I don't care, and you obviously don't care because, in that sense, one or two sentences are enough for you to solidify your opinion of the person. Just because stupid people do stupid things doesn't mean that all people who sometimes do stupid things are stupid too. Stupidity is highly situational, only if you really don't understand anything about the world for the majority of your entire life are you really stupid.
There are legitimate people who have no idea that child abuse exists. It is actually hardly possible any more, because we are all confronted with such topics on the internet, radio or in newspapers and stories told by others, but there are definitely people who can live without all that. These people live in a bubble, but that doesn't make them stupid. There is a big difference between stupidity and ignorance.
I definitely couldn't read yesterday, you cleverly realised. Well done! Do you want a medal now? How could I? Have you ever been intoxicated?
--
Billy247newaccount_35467829
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Lmao, yeah I don't think i'm above anyone. If calling someone stupid means i'm vain, regardless if I know someone or not, I guess a lot of the users on here are vain. I will admit that you did make a good point when you said, and I quote:"There is a difference between stupid people and stupid deeds. To say that someone is stupid just because they say or do something stupid in your eyes does not mean that this person is stupid in general. You said before that it was stupid for me to doubt that OP's thought world is disturbing, acceptable even if I disagree, now you think I'm stupid because of the few things you read from me on here?". So I will correct myself, but don't get too proud. What you SAID was stupid. Sound better?
"I definitely couldn't read yesterday, you cleverly realised. Well done! Do you want a medal now? How could I? Have you ever been intoxicated?".
To answer your question, no. And also, how am I supposed to know you were a little drunk bastard yesterday? Lmfao. Do YOU want a medal?
--
SmokesTheScrapper
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No, thank you, sir. That would be a waste of space. Already have enough trophies in my cupboard. And, to answer your question: not at all, that's why I noted that. One should not take everything a drunken "bastard" says deadly seriously. Sooner or later it will only lead to conflict.
--
Billy247newaccount_35467829
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I also don't want one, thanks for the offer though.😀