How subjective. Where might it start for you? When do the hairs on the back of your neck stand up?
What might be disturbing for you might be pretty normal for others, y'know. Why would you judge me for not taking it too serious?
First of all, I was saying "how bad could it be?" was a very stupid thing to say because you should know by now they can get pretty weird and nasty. And wow, thanks for proving your stupidity. Some pedophiles find their attraction normal, but is it? No. And when I said "disturbing" i'm talking about things like pedophilia disturbing. Not saying the OP is having fantasies related to pedophilia, but that's just an example to how bad they can get.
I didn't say they couldn't be pretty sick in general, however I don't believe OP's fantasies are that blatant and I'm still curious what these fantasies are so that I can really judge. In the end we both don't know them. Just because they're illegal they don't have to be disturbing. I'm stupid for that now? Haha, whatever. Wow, really. So many are stupid in your eyes on here so why should I be mithered. I know I'm not the smartest brain on earth, even worse when I'm drugging myself which is what I do very often, so what? It's pretty vain of you to just call random strangers stupid. I agree with you that paedophilia is not normal tho. But for me it only becomes really disturbing when the paedophile actually becomes the perpetrator. I don't know if you're aware of it, but quite a lot of them don't want to pursue it either.
And thanks for proving you can't read. I said SOME pedophiles think their fantasies are normal. Not all. And so what? The reason why so many people on here are stupid in my eyes, is because they say and do things that are, in my opinion, stupid. It's because they are stupid. Who's fault is that? And no, that does not make me "vain" lmfao. If you're going on the internet being stupid, then don't be surprised when someone tells you you're being an idiot. I don't need to know someone in order for their stupidity to be proven. For example, someone on here asked if child abuse exists. Unless they were trolling, that said a lot about their intelligence. That proved how stupid they are. For me it's already disturbing to have the thoughts pedophiles have. It's even more disturbing to act on it.
There is a difference between stupid people and stupid deeds. To say that someone is stupid just because they say or do something stupid in your eyes does not mean that this person is stupid in general. You said before that it was stupid for me to doubt that OP's thought world is disturbing, acceptable even if I disagree, now you think I'm stupid because of the few things you read from me on here? lmao You can't know that, according to that you are vain. Because you judge people without knowing them, and the way you do it, you put yourself above them, consciously or subconsciously, I don't care, and you obviously don't care because, in that sense, one or two sentences are enough for you to solidify your opinion of the person. Just because stupid people do stupid things doesn't mean that all people who sometimes do stupid things are stupid too. Stupidity is highly situational, only if you really don't understand anything about the world for the majority of your entire life are you really stupid.
There are legitimate people who have no idea that child abuse exists. It is actually hardly possible any more, because we are all confronted with such topics on the internet, radio or in newspapers and stories told by others, but there are definitely people who can live without all that. These people live in a bubble, but that doesn't make them stupid. There is a big difference between stupidity and ignorance.
I definitely couldn't read yesterday, you cleverly realised. Well done! Do you want a medal now? How could I? Have you ever been intoxicated?
Lmao, yeah I don't think i'm above anyone. If calling someone stupid means i'm vain, regardless if I know someone or not, I guess a lot of the users on here are vain. I will admit that you did make a good point when you said, and I quote:"There is a difference between stupid people and stupid deeds. To say that someone is stupid just because they say or do something stupid in your eyes does not mean that this person is stupid in general. You said before that it was stupid for me to doubt that OP's thought world is disturbing, acceptable even if I disagree, now you think I'm stupid because of the few things you read from me on here?". So I will correct myself, but don't get too proud. What you SAID was stupid. Sound better?
"I definitely couldn't read yesterday, you cleverly realised. Well done! Do you want a medal now? How could I? Have you ever been intoxicated?".
To answer your question, no. And also, how am I supposed to know you were a little drunk bastard yesterday? Lmfao. Do YOU want a medal?
No, thank you, sir. That would be a waste of space. Already have enough trophies in my cupboard. And, to answer your question: not at all, that's why I noted that. One should not take everything a drunken "bastard" says deadly seriously. Sooner or later it will only lead to conflict.
Some of you are getting closer to what I think about. But it's not only the content, but the frequency. I can't stop thinking about naked people and what I would do with them.
My sex addiction's getting worse
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
How subjective. Where might it start for you? When do the hairs on the back of your neck stand up?
What might be disturbing for you might be pretty normal for others, y'know. Why would you judge me for not taking it too serious?
--
Billy247newaccount_35467829
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
First of all, I was saying "how bad could it be?" was a very stupid thing to say because you should know by now they can get pretty weird and nasty. And wow, thanks for proving your stupidity. Some pedophiles find their attraction normal, but is it? No. And when I said "disturbing" i'm talking about things like pedophilia disturbing. Not saying the OP is having fantasies related to pedophilia, but that's just an example to how bad they can get.
--
SmokesTheScrapper
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
igaveneteine
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I didn't say they couldn't be pretty sick in general, however I don't believe OP's fantasies are that blatant and I'm still curious what these fantasies are so that I can really judge. In the end we both don't know them. Just because they're illegal they don't have to be disturbing. I'm stupid for that now? Haha, whatever. Wow, really. So many are stupid in your eyes on here so why should I be mithered. I know I'm not the smartest brain on earth, even worse when I'm drugging myself which is what I do very often, so what? It's pretty vain of you to just call random strangers stupid. I agree with you that paedophilia is not normal tho. But for me it only becomes really disturbing when the paedophile actually becomes the perpetrator. I don't know if you're aware of it, but quite a lot of them don't want to pursue it either.
--
Billy247newaccount_35467829
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
And thanks for proving you can't read. I said SOME pedophiles think their fantasies are normal. Not all. And so what? The reason why so many people on here are stupid in my eyes, is because they say and do things that are, in my opinion, stupid. It's because they are stupid. Who's fault is that? And no, that does not make me "vain" lmfao. If you're going on the internet being stupid, then don't be surprised when someone tells you you're being an idiot. I don't need to know someone in order for their stupidity to be proven. For example, someone on here asked if child abuse exists. Unless they were trolling, that said a lot about their intelligence. That proved how stupid they are. For me it's already disturbing to have the thoughts pedophiles have. It's even more disturbing to act on it.
--
SmokesTheScrapper
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
There is a difference between stupid people and stupid deeds. To say that someone is stupid just because they say or do something stupid in your eyes does not mean that this person is stupid in general. You said before that it was stupid for me to doubt that OP's thought world is disturbing, acceptable even if I disagree, now you think I'm stupid because of the few things you read from me on here? lmao You can't know that, according to that you are vain. Because you judge people without knowing them, and the way you do it, you put yourself above them, consciously or subconsciously, I don't care, and you obviously don't care because, in that sense, one or two sentences are enough for you to solidify your opinion of the person. Just because stupid people do stupid things doesn't mean that all people who sometimes do stupid things are stupid too. Stupidity is highly situational, only if you really don't understand anything about the world for the majority of your entire life are you really stupid.
There are legitimate people who have no idea that child abuse exists. It is actually hardly possible any more, because we are all confronted with such topics on the internet, radio or in newspapers and stories told by others, but there are definitely people who can live without all that. These people live in a bubble, but that doesn't make them stupid. There is a big difference between stupidity and ignorance.
I definitely couldn't read yesterday, you cleverly realised. Well done! Do you want a medal now? How could I? Have you ever been intoxicated?
--
Billy247newaccount_35467829
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Lmao, yeah I don't think i'm above anyone. If calling someone stupid means i'm vain, regardless if I know someone or not, I guess a lot of the users on here are vain. I will admit that you did make a good point when you said, and I quote:"There is a difference between stupid people and stupid deeds. To say that someone is stupid just because they say or do something stupid in your eyes does not mean that this person is stupid in general. You said before that it was stupid for me to doubt that OP's thought world is disturbing, acceptable even if I disagree, now you think I'm stupid because of the few things you read from me on here?". So I will correct myself, but don't get too proud. What you SAID was stupid. Sound better?
"I definitely couldn't read yesterday, you cleverly realised. Well done! Do you want a medal now? How could I? Have you ever been intoxicated?".
To answer your question, no. And also, how am I supposed to know you were a little drunk bastard yesterday? Lmfao. Do YOU want a medal?
--
SmokesTheScrapper
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
No, thank you, sir. That would be a waste of space. Already have enough trophies in my cupboard. And, to answer your question: not at all, that's why I noted that. One should not take everything a drunken "bastard" says deadly seriously. Sooner or later it will only lead to conflict.
Game, set, match
--
Anonymous Post Author
1 year ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Some of you are getting closer to what I think about. But it's not only the content, but the frequency. I can't stop thinking about naked people and what I would do with them.