It turns out you CAN sue doctors, by the way. I'm sort of surprised you don't know that.
Your doctors aren't your employees, though. You don't hire them. You're paying them for the service, but they are the employees of the hospital or practice they work for. It sucks to go to a doctor who doesn't listen or won't give you the care you need, but the way you're looking at this still doesn't really make any sense. If doctors had to apply to be hired by their patients, getting care would be much more labour intensive for the patients AND the doctors. Why don't you just ask around and research online?
Well duh, you can sue them if they botch something or harm you but you can't sue them for being a dick or wasting your time.
They are too my damn employee, I'm paying them. It's no different than a lawyer or a roofer. If I hire a roofer and ask him for green shingles and he happens to dislike green shingles and refuses, then guess what? He gets fired, or not hired in the first place. Same should go for a doctor.
You don't directly pay the doctor, you pay the practice or hospital. Employees are people who you hire and pay directly. Doctors are employees of the organisation you're paying, not your employees.
Lawyers and roofers don't fill out applications to work for you either, by the way, and roofers are usually contractors, not employees.
OP is actually more or less right. You're employing the organization, who employs the doctors. Doctor does a bad job, complain to the employer, file a complaint, refuse to ever go back.
No, you are a customer of the organisation. "Customer" and "employer" are not synonymous. I agree that what you described is a good way to handle it, though.
If you think you are the 'customer', you will begin to follow the mindset that you have no control over what you 'purchase'. You think you only have so many 'brands' to choose from, and that is the bottom line.
On the other hand, if you follow the 'employer' mindset, you realize you DO have control over your situation. You are NOT subjugated to just a few 'brands' because you begin to realize purchasing services is not like purchasing toilet paper. You are the master in this mindset, and you don't have to do what you don't want to, and you don't have to put up with rough toilet paper OR shitty doctors.
My New Policy: Job Applications for Doctors!
← View full post
It turns out you CAN sue doctors, by the way. I'm sort of surprised you don't know that.
Your doctors aren't your employees, though. You don't hire them. You're paying them for the service, but they are the employees of the hospital or practice they work for. It sucks to go to a doctor who doesn't listen or won't give you the care you need, but the way you're looking at this still doesn't really make any sense. If doctors had to apply to be hired by their patients, getting care would be much more labour intensive for the patients AND the doctors. Why don't you just ask around and research online?
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Well duh, you can sue them if they botch something or harm you but you can't sue them for being a dick or wasting your time.
They are too my damn employee, I'm paying them. It's no different than a lawyer or a roofer. If I hire a roofer and ask him for green shingles and he happens to dislike green shingles and refuses, then guess what? He gets fired, or not hired in the first place. Same should go for a doctor.
--
VioletTrees
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You don't directly pay the doctor, you pay the practice or hospital. Employees are people who you hire and pay directly. Doctors are employees of the organisation you're paying, not your employees.
Lawyers and roofers don't fill out applications to work for you either, by the way, and roofers are usually contractors, not employees.
--
Redcoats
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
MissyLeyneous
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
You're fighting a losing battle here, they just don't seem to get it. Best to forget about it and move on (:
OP is actually more or less right. You're employing the organization, who employs the doctors. Doctor does a bad job, complain to the employer, file a complaint, refuse to ever go back.
That'll get the moneybags attention.
--
VioletTrees
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No, you are a customer of the organisation. "Customer" and "employer" are not synonymous. I agree that what you described is a good way to handle it, though.
--
MissyLeyneous
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It's all based on "perspective".
If you think you are the 'customer', you will begin to follow the mindset that you have no control over what you 'purchase'. You think you only have so many 'brands' to choose from, and that is the bottom line.
On the other hand, if you follow the 'employer' mindset, you realize you DO have control over your situation. You are NOT subjugated to just a few 'brands' because you begin to realize purchasing services is not like purchasing toilet paper. You are the master in this mindset, and you don't have to do what you don't want to, and you don't have to put up with rough toilet paper OR shitty doctors.
I follow the latter view. ^_^