Please tell me where and by whom, 'It's been said that a concern for animal welfare is an almost exclusively White Caucasoid trait'.
How can you defend such an ignorant and bigoted post? America is NOT the center of the world, nor are Americans the only human beings with moral principles. Long before the first white person stepped on the shores of the 'new world', Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism maintained that all life is sacred. Respect for life, be it animal or not is not a trait exclusive to white folk and it could probably be shown that white folk are responsible for the majority of the extinctions on this planet over the last 200 years or so, just so these very same white folk could make more money.
It was a position held by Dr. William Luther Pierce, for one. I consider it to have merit as it indeed seems as if Whites are the ones at the forefront of crusades of humanitarianism, environmentalism and animal rights. How often do you see Blacks risking life and limb to liberate defenseless animals from medical testing? The Japanese wouldn't dream of "saving the whales;" they'd rather eat them.
I'm defending the post in question because it's a personal observation; no more or less. If this person has noticed that most Vegans are White, then what could you possibly offer as a refutation for such a statement? "No, you HAVEN'T noticed that most vegans are White"?
Fair enough. I understand your view and respect it, though I can not agree.
Though I would joyfully slay any human that kills whales, I would not say that the Japanese were representative of all Orientals, just because they are all yellow.
Most vegans/vegetarians are white IIN
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I fail to see how such an assessment could be considered ignorant or bigoted. It's an honest observation.
It's been said that a concern for animal welfare is an almost exclusively White Caucasoid trait, so I assume that's at least part of the answer.
--
thegypsysailor
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Please tell me where and by whom, 'It's been said that a concern for animal welfare is an almost exclusively White Caucasoid trait'.
How can you defend such an ignorant and bigoted post? America is NOT the center of the world, nor are Americans the only human beings with moral principles. Long before the first white person stepped on the shores of the 'new world', Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism maintained that all life is sacred. Respect for life, be it animal or not is not a trait exclusive to white folk and it could probably be shown that white folk are responsible for the majority of the extinctions on this planet over the last 200 years or so, just so these very same white folk could make more money.
--
[Old Memory]
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It was a position held by Dr. William Luther Pierce, for one. I consider it to have merit as it indeed seems as if Whites are the ones at the forefront of crusades of humanitarianism, environmentalism and animal rights. How often do you see Blacks risking life and limb to liberate defenseless animals from medical testing? The Japanese wouldn't dream of "saving the whales;" they'd rather eat them.
I'm defending the post in question because it's a personal observation; no more or less. If this person has noticed that most Vegans are White, then what could you possibly offer as a refutation for such a statement? "No, you HAVEN'T noticed that most vegans are White"?
--
thegypsysailor
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Fair enough. I understand your view and respect it, though I can not agree.
Though I would joyfully slay any human that kills whales, I would not say that the Japanese were representative of all Orientals, just because they are all yellow.