Consider this hypothetical. A man and a woman somehow are the last people on earth and they're perfectly aware of this fact. However, they speak different languages. Now, for the good of humanity, if only one of them wanted to procreate and had no means by which to convince the other, would that necessarily be wrong?
Be aware that if you go back to the caveman era, this was nearly the case according to research. In this case, either a series of grunts was considered assent, simply not objecting was, or that prehistoric man simply saw rape as a means to an end.
I'm not in any way trying to justify these actions, but it's sometimes necessary to see just how far we've come in every aspect as a race and morality is usually neglected.
Morality doesn't exist in reality.
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
When is it ever necessary?
Consider this hypothetical. A man and a woman somehow are the last people on earth and they're perfectly aware of this fact. However, they speak different languages. Now, for the good of humanity, if only one of them wanted to procreate and had no means by which to convince the other, would that necessarily be wrong?
Be aware that if you go back to the caveman era, this was nearly the case according to research. In this case, either a series of grunts was considered assent, simply not objecting was, or that prehistoric man simply saw rape as a means to an end.
I'm not in any way trying to justify these actions, but it's sometimes necessary to see just how far we've come in every aspect as a race and morality is usually neglected.