I wrote you a long reply but it disappeared into the aether because my broadband had cut out just before I clicked the submit button. Kind of ironic on a post about communication problems. I'll see if I can remember what I said.
I spoke about having problems communicating from the age of four and how frustrating it was. I learnt as many words as I could in the hope some of them would be understood by people, but this still isn't the way people communicate. I then stripped down the way I talk to be a version of something I'd already translated once in my head.
People think I type quite primly and maybe a little too precisely here. I do it because I have to. It's the only way I can get things across. I understand how difficult it is to feel isolated because nobody appears to speak the same language as you. I thought they were choosing to misunderstand me as some kind of cruel joke. It made me so angry.
I almost replied to your other post to say my answer would be a cross between making the world a better place and learning everything I could. I still have a thirst to learn that is almost unquenchable, even though I know it gives further potential for linking things that would remain better unlinked. It's not knowing stuff that's the problem. It's connecting the stuff I do know.
Anyway, I'm glad also that I've had the chance to unburden a little about this too. If it's helped you even an iota to know that someone else goes through it, then I'm especially glad. After all, that's what we're here for. Well, most of us, anyway.
i understand you quite clearly. that's the thing, though. everything is linked, but it is not likely anybody will ever know "everything". i like to think of it like this; a tree has bark, but if you never learn that a tree has bark, though, that doesn't mean that the tree doesn't have bark. when we look for knowledge to feed ourselves, it's as if we are lost and trying to survive, then suddenly coming across a chest. looking this chest is like looking for knowledge. it maybe empty, but we look because of the chance that it might be full, and we do not want to passing it by only to find out it contained a map. not to mention, we normally don't have any other clues as to where we look next. we do not want to abandon potential, our problem is thinking that great knowledge is recognized instinctively, and so we continue to look for something that awes our minds. but great knowledge is only as impressive as the attention you give it. and the more you know about a magic trick, the less exiting it is.
it's actually very much like a magic show. we spend more time looking for the trick than at the trick. then when you finally discover the trick, it's not a big deal to you.
little understood about iq score
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I wrote you a long reply but it disappeared into the aether because my broadband had cut out just before I clicked the submit button. Kind of ironic on a post about communication problems. I'll see if I can remember what I said.
I spoke about having problems communicating from the age of four and how frustrating it was. I learnt as many words as I could in the hope some of them would be understood by people, but this still isn't the way people communicate. I then stripped down the way I talk to be a version of something I'd already translated once in my head.
People think I type quite primly and maybe a little too precisely here. I do it because I have to. It's the only way I can get things across. I understand how difficult it is to feel isolated because nobody appears to speak the same language as you. I thought they were choosing to misunderstand me as some kind of cruel joke. It made me so angry.
I almost replied to your other post to say my answer would be a cross between making the world a better place and learning everything I could. I still have a thirst to learn that is almost unquenchable, even though I know it gives further potential for linking things that would remain better unlinked. It's not knowing stuff that's the problem. It's connecting the stuff I do know.
Anyway, I'm glad also that I've had the chance to unburden a little about this too. If it's helped you even an iota to know that someone else goes through it, then I'm especially glad. After all, that's what we're here for. Well, most of us, anyway.
--
Anonymous Post Author
12 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
i understand you quite clearly. that's the thing, though. everything is linked, but it is not likely anybody will ever know "everything". i like to think of it like this; a tree has bark, but if you never learn that a tree has bark, though, that doesn't mean that the tree doesn't have bark. when we look for knowledge to feed ourselves, it's as if we are lost and trying to survive, then suddenly coming across a chest. looking this chest is like looking for knowledge. it maybe empty, but we look because of the chance that it might be full, and we do not want to passing it by only to find out it contained a map. not to mention, we normally don't have any other clues as to where we look next. we do not want to abandon potential, our problem is thinking that great knowledge is recognized instinctively, and so we continue to look for something that awes our minds. but great knowledge is only as impressive as the attention you give it. and the more you know about a magic trick, the less exiting it is.
it's actually very much like a magic show. we spend more time looking for the trick than at the trick. then when you finally discover the trick, it's not a big deal to you.