Yes, and its always important to give the other side of the argument. We do this thing in western media where we give only one side of the narrative because the other side is wrong. But even if its wrong it would be useful to hear the other side to get a better understanding.
If you could sit down with someone like Andrew Jackson he would probably give an argument as to why he moved the native Americans. Perhaps he would argue "we moved them to avoid war and hostility, we also paid them for their land." It doesnt mean he's right in doing so but it should be heard..
Like to hear other perspectives
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Yes, and its always important to give the other side of the argument. We do this thing in western media where we give only one side of the narrative because the other side is wrong. But even if its wrong it would be useful to hear the other side to get a better understanding.
If you could sit down with someone like Andrew Jackson he would probably give an argument as to why he moved the native Americans. Perhaps he would argue "we moved them to avoid war and hostility, we also paid them for their land." It doesnt mean he's right in doing so but it should be heard..