Yes, we all have our personal preference to some degree! Doesn't mean we exclude certain people, just means we aren't initially attracted to them physically. Some guys prefer bigger woman over slim girls for example, doesn't mean that they would never fall for a skinny girl though. Just means its unlikely they'll become sexually involved with someone of that body type.
I am not superficial because I tend to feel things for someone when I get to know their personality but I also have to have some degree of physical attraction or otherwise they would just be classed as a friend .
Lesbian lady has a partner but I think she's grooming me! IIN?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
People aren't "types" but if you want to see others in that superficial way that's up to you.
--
Anonymous Post Author
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
3
3
Yes, we all have our personal preference to some degree! Doesn't mean we exclude certain people, just means we aren't initially attracted to them physically. Some guys prefer bigger woman over slim girls for example, doesn't mean that they would never fall for a skinny girl though. Just means its unlikely they'll become sexually involved with someone of that body type.
I am not superficial because I tend to feel things for someone when I get to know their personality but I also have to have some degree of physical attraction or otherwise they would just be classed as a friend .
--
Ellenna
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ok fair enough, but I still think even using the term "type" about other people is superficial: what's more, it serves no purpose whatsoever
--
Anonymous Post Author
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well what word would you like me to replace it with that still relays what im trying to say?
--
Ellenna
7 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It's the concept of seeing others as "types" rather than as individuals which I find problematic, not the word itself as such.