Well if she is underage, then it is implied that her consent is not valid. That is wjy in the post I said as long as it was consensual, LEGAL and somewhat safe. Now what makes 2 legal adults having consensual sex worse if they add in bondage or spanking for the increase of pleaseure?
No, not in all countries and that's beside the point. Hypothetically, if aged 15, 16 were a legal age and a 40 or 60 year old were to be in a sexual relationship with the girl. It is STILL WRONG!! Just because they both want to have the sex doenst make it just. The 60 year old should know what is right and what is NOT. It comes down to a moral compass. We are not animals. You really need to grow up, I feel like I'm either talking to someone who is mentally autistic or a 10 year old. If you're autistic I am really sorry for not realizing this. If you're 10, you need to be off this site, this is an adults only site R18, if none of the above apply, I'm sorry to say but you really need help, perhaps invest some time and money into therapy.
I am 27 years old and am not autistic. And I enjoy kinky sex like others on this site. Is cuntsiclestick autist and 10 years old too? Also, you seem to still be doging my point, WHY IS IT IMMORAL? Please share something more than 'its just wrong, and also your austistic' everything that is immoral, is immoral for a reason. And I can not for the life of me see why kinky sex is immoral? Do I need to make a new post asking if people think it is? Because I am sure a decent chunk of people would not think so. You are in the minority on this topic in my estimation, but that doesn't mean your wrong. Just at least give a better explaination than something about a 'moral compass, and its just wrong'. Please adress the argument not the arguer!!
Sure, you're 27, what ever...I dont believe trolls as this is a troll post I have come to believe. Did i say anthignwas wrong with sex? No. It's just a lot of "kinky acts" are immoral, they are lowly acts and send wrong messages. I'd give you an example but then you would go on a tangent in trying to justify why it's right because you strike me as the righteous and matter of fact type rather than able to think for yourself nor do you have any sense of virtues. Cuntsickle is a different person altogether. They are irrelevant to topic at hand. Here is a link, and this is the type of crap I am talking about.
I didn't get your link, was it in your last comment?
Some kinky shit could easily be immoral. Kinky is a very umbrella term that includes any abnormal sexual practices or fixations. This would include very extreme things like genital torture, castration and also legitaimte sex slavery, which I would not blame you for seeing as immoral. But if I am with a girl and we both agree that sex would be better if I tie her up before I fuck her, and we use a safe word, I don't see how that is immoral. So I would not agree with the blanket statment that kinky sex is immoral, but rather specific kinky acts are that should be detailed. Some kinky things I have done that are mostly benign and not immoral in my opinion of course are:
- Bondage and sex
-bondage for arousal on its own
-bondage and gags
-bondage and spanking
-spanking before sex
-use of a collar and leash
-strap on sex
-enemas for arousal
All of these are with consent and some form of safe word
Well kikny sex, is an umbrella term, yes, doesn't necessarily mean it's of a moral nature ofc. Well the link I sent supports the idea I am not the only person who does not condone choking. In fact it states this encourages men all the more to be of a violent rapey nature, which I fully agree with. It has gone beyond what normal sex should be, over the threshold even worse than how animals act yet we are meant to be the evolved ones? Use of collar and leash, that is animalistic in nature. We aren't animals. Do you see humans walking around on all fours and cocking their leg to piss here and there? No.
Take on board the fact it can be an umbrella term but do remember it will always have a negative connotation because when you hear the word kinky, we think of the worst case scenario acts. It will always be deemed this way
Choking and other forms of asphixation are something I would never mess with. But just because something is animalistic does not make it immoral, in my opinion of course! I do understand that people will think the worst when they hear the word 'kinky', and I don't think it should have the default negative connotation that it has. People do things that if it were not for sexual pleasure of it, would be consideted insane or degenerate. I give them a pass for just doing what gives them more pleasure. I myself get greater pleasure from doing admitedly, weird ass shit. But I know it is just for pleasure and it is worth it to me.
Kink shaming Iin?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Well if she is underage, then it is implied that her consent is not valid. That is wjy in the post I said as long as it was consensual, LEGAL and somewhat safe. Now what makes 2 legal adults having consensual sex worse if they add in bondage or spanking for the increase of pleaseure?
--
strangethingshappen
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No, not in all countries and that's beside the point. Hypothetically, if aged 15, 16 were a legal age and a 40 or 60 year old were to be in a sexual relationship with the girl. It is STILL WRONG!! Just because they both want to have the sex doenst make it just. The 60 year old should know what is right and what is NOT. It comes down to a moral compass. We are not animals. You really need to grow up, I feel like I'm either talking to someone who is mentally autistic or a 10 year old. If you're autistic I am really sorry for not realizing this. If you're 10, you need to be off this site, this is an adults only site R18, if none of the above apply, I'm sorry to say but you really need help, perhaps invest some time and money into therapy.
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I am 27 years old and am not autistic. And I enjoy kinky sex like others on this site. Is cuntsiclestick autist and 10 years old too? Also, you seem to still be doging my point, WHY IS IT IMMORAL? Please share something more than 'its just wrong, and also your austistic' everything that is immoral, is immoral for a reason. And I can not for the life of me see why kinky sex is immoral? Do I need to make a new post asking if people think it is? Because I am sure a decent chunk of people would not think so. You are in the minority on this topic in my estimation, but that doesn't mean your wrong. Just at least give a better explaination than something about a 'moral compass, and its just wrong'. Please adress the argument not the arguer!!
--
strangethingshappen
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Sure, you're 27, what ever...I dont believe trolls as this is a troll post I have come to believe. Did i say anthignwas wrong with sex? No. It's just a lot of "kinky acts" are immoral, they are lowly acts and send wrong messages. I'd give you an example but then you would go on a tangent in trying to justify why it's right because you strike me as the righteous and matter of fact type rather than able to think for yourself nor do you have any sense of virtues. Cuntsickle is a different person altogether. They are irrelevant to topic at hand. Here is a link, and this is the type of crap I am talking about.
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I didn't get your link, was it in your last comment?
Some kinky shit could easily be immoral. Kinky is a very umbrella term that includes any abnormal sexual practices or fixations. This would include very extreme things like genital torture, castration and also legitaimte sex slavery, which I would not blame you for seeing as immoral. But if I am with a girl and we both agree that sex would be better if I tie her up before I fuck her, and we use a safe word, I don't see how that is immoral. So I would not agree with the blanket statment that kinky sex is immoral, but rather specific kinky acts are that should be detailed. Some kinky things I have done that are mostly benign and not immoral in my opinion of course are:
- Bondage and sex
-bondage for arousal on its own
-bondage and gags
-bondage and spanking
-spanking before sex
-use of a collar and leash
-strap on sex
-enemas for arousal
All of these are with consent and some form of safe word
--
strangethingshappen
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well kikny sex, is an umbrella term, yes, doesn't necessarily mean it's of a moral nature ofc. Well the link I sent supports the idea I am not the only person who does not condone choking. In fact it states this encourages men all the more to be of a violent rapey nature, which I fully agree with. It has gone beyond what normal sex should be, over the threshold even worse than how animals act yet we are meant to be the evolved ones? Use of collar and leash, that is animalistic in nature. We aren't animals. Do you see humans walking around on all fours and cocking their leg to piss here and there? No.
Take on board the fact it can be an umbrella term but do remember it will always have a negative connotation because when you hear the word kinky, we think of the worst case scenario acts. It will always be deemed this way
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Choking and other forms of asphixation are something I would never mess with. But just because something is animalistic does not make it immoral, in my opinion of course! I do understand that people will think the worst when they hear the word 'kinky', and I don't think it should have the default negative connotation that it has. People do things that if it were not for sexual pleasure of it, would be consideted insane or degenerate. I give them a pass for just doing what gives them more pleasure. I myself get greater pleasure from doing admitedly, weird ass shit. But I know it is just for pleasure and it is worth it to me.